Document/Bulleted List - Color

Yes, I’d be happy to. Yes, I can do that. Yes, of course, yes.

Stepping up to the plate, being engaged, working hard—in a workplace that fosters continuous learning and improvement, these are qualities we prize in our colleagues and cultivate in ourselves.

And, in a sprawling, complex organization like ours, with myriad initiatives and projects, these traits can be our undoing. If we say yes to everything, we wind up spread too thin. Spread too thin, we lose effectiveness. Trying to regain the ground we think we should already have covered, we go faster and faster, start to spin our wheels and—burn ourselves out.

We do it as individuals, and we do it in our unit-based teams, too: Yes, we can do that. Yes, we’ll take that on. And then there’s too much to do and an effort to improve sputters out.

There are lots of techniques for individuals to manage competing demands. As UBTs mature, they and their mentors are getting savvy about the importance of having teams set priorities, too.

Developing teams don’t always have the confidence it takes to say no. In “From Frenzied to Focused,” Denise Johnson, the continuum of care administrator at San Jose Medical Center, notes that we have a tendency to think more is better. She and other UBT supporters are helping their teams map out the path forward, teaching them to discriminate (in all the best senses of that word)—to know when to say “yes” and when “no, not now” is in order.

Fewer, well-chosen projects have a greater impact on Kaiser Permanente’s quality of care, service and affordability. And not being constantly frazzled certainly helps create a better place to work, too.

“Team” is a noun. “Teaming” is a verb, defined by the woman who coined it as teamwork on the fly, coordinating and collaborating across boundaries, without the luxury of stable team structures.

That woman, Harvard Business School Professor Amy Edmondson, talked to the 2012 Union Delegates Conference about why teaming is such a crucial skill, especially for those in health care settings where work is complex and unpredictable.

“In health care, many times people are interacting with each other in an emergency room, for instance, now, for five minutes, but they don’t know each other,” says Edmondson. “The catch is we have to act as if we trust each other…because we often don’t have the luxury of having a lot of time to get to know each other.”

A “team” is a static, stable entity. But, says Edmondson, “In health care, if we wait until we have the perfectly designed ‘team,’ the moment has passed. We have to get together quickly, do what needs to be done, and then disband and do other things.”

In the absence of long-term work relationships, Edmondson says allegiance to an organization with a compelling vision can be the glue that holds these teams-on-the-fly together. “There is the pride in working for KP,” for instance, she says. “That is a real bond.”

Looking at the performance improvement work of unit-based teams at Kaiser Permanente, the principles of teaming still apply. While not as fluid as an emergency room, UBTs still see plenty of flux. Just think about the manager that gets promoted or retires, or the labor co-lead who rotates out of that role. The team has to be able to keep focused on improving performance even as the cast of characters changes.

UBTs can be stable teams that do great work. They are a very powerful tool,” Edmondson says. “And yet, I also want people to be able to quickly get up to speed, do what needs to be done with other people in the absence of those stable structures.”

A UBT needs to be a scaffold that is strong enough to withstand the flux, says Edmondson.

“If there is clarity about what the structure looks like—independent of the people who are in that structure—you are better off,” says Edmondson, a point explored in research she’s conducted with Harvard colleague Melissa Valentine. “We won’t always have the same human beings in those roles, but the roles are reasonably static.”