Successful practices

Like Night and Day

Submitted by Laureen Lazarovici on Wed, 04/20/2011 - 15:52
Topics
Taxonomy upgrade extras
Request Number
sty_Night and Day
Long Teaser

In the cover story from the Spring 2011 Hank, unit-based teams in three different departments find ways to fix the long-standing disconnect between the day and night shifts, and in the process, boost performance by working together.

Communicator (reporters)
Laureen Lazarovici
Editor (if known, reporters)
Tyra Ferlatte
Notes (as needed)
4/25: caption for second photo:
Riverside EVS attendant Virginia Gonzalez, a United Steelworkers Local 7600 member.
Photos & Artwork (reporters)
Riverside EVS attendant Robert Casillas, a member of United Steelworkers Local 7600
Only use image in listings (editors)
not listing only
Highlighted stories and tools (reporters)
Tips to Help 24/7 UBTS

Use this checklist to help pull your team together.

Status
Released
Tracking (editors)
Story content (editors)
Deck
At KP, health care is 24/7, and unit-based teams are finding ways to fix a longstanding weak link--the disconnect between shifts
Story body part 1

In health care, there is no such thing as “normal business hours.” Babies insist on being born at 3 a.m. A car crash or bursting appendix can land a patient in the Emergency Room at noon or midnight or 5 a.m. To prevent infections, the cleanliness of hospital rooms is just as important at 4 a.m. as at 4 p.m.

So what’s a unit-based team to do? Full participation in a team’s performance improvement work from all members on all shifts can send service and quality scores soaring—while shifts left out in the cold can drag down a whole department. It’s hard enough ensuring all members of a single shift are on board.

But getting everyone onboard around the clock is a daunting challenge. Shifts that pass in the night may be oblivious to the other’s particular challenges and culture. They might not fully understand how their own work affects the other shift’s workflow. Rivalries and finger-pointing can ensue.

NIGHT OWLS IN THE LAB

As the double doors swing open, cold night air blasts into the receiving bay at the Regional Reference Laboratory in North Hollywood, California. Employees are ready, bundled up in knit scarves and hoodies. It’s 11:30 p.m. on a mid-February night, and couriers are delivering gray cooler bags filled with vials and tubes of specimens from all over Southern California. Clinics from Kern County in the north to San Diego, nearly 180 miles south, have closed for the evening. Now all of those blood tests and urine samples have to be processed and analyzed so providers can detect disease or spot the warning signs of a developing chronic condition.

At the specimen processing department, the graveyard shift is the busiest. “We’re like the mailroom,” says Leland Chan, supervisor and management co-lead. More than 10,000 specimens go to the automated chemistry department during the graveyard shift, compared with about 4,300 in the morning and nearly 9,000 at night.

Michael Aragones, the labor co-lead, likens the three shifts to gears all rotating together and powering each other forward. But not so long ago, the gears were getting jammed up.

Building resentments

Something was going on: Staff members on each shift thought the workload wasn’t being distributed equally—and they were getting the short end of the stick. Employees with different duties on the same shift felt the same way about their peers.

“There was a lot of ‘back talk’ between the shifts,” says Aragones, a lab assistant II and member of SEIU UHW. “People would say, ‘How come they are doing this or that?’ and ‘How come I have so much work?’ ”

The unit-based team was the vehicle for improving the workflow. Team members from all shifts got involved collecting, collating and analyzing data about the specimen count, hour by hour.


Riverside EVS attendant Virginia Gonzalez, a United Steelworkers Local 7600 member.

The results revealed why employees were feeling overworked: Between 2008 and 2010, the number of specimens going to bacteriology, for instance, increased from fewer than 4,000 to more than 5,000. Moreover, the time of night that most specimens arrived had changed. The lab used to see a big spike around 9:30 p.m.; now the rush came about 11 p.m. So the team adjusted the start and end time of the graveyard shift to match the flow of work coming in.

“At first, there was a lot of resistance,” Chan says, with employees worried about child care arrangements and traffic. The data, however, “gave us a better understanding of the workflow,” which let staff members see why they were being asked to make changes. “It was the UBT that helped solve that.”

 “It wasn’t managers saying, ‘Well, you just have to,’ ” Aragones says. “We have to look at workflow for the whole department, not just one shift. It’s like a spider web. You pull one strand, and it affects the whole thing.”

Now that the work is flowing better, the UBT is working on new initiatives.

“The UBT makes my life easier,” says Chan. “It allows me to work more closely with the crew because we are on equal terms. Sometimes, as a manager, you don’t have all the answers. They do the work, they are the experts.”

COOKING UP CAMARADERIE

It is 7:15 p.m. in the kitchen of the Downey Medical Center. “Huddddlllle!” shouts Francisco Vargas, a gentle giant of a man. The sound of his booming voice echoes off the tile floors and stainless steel work surfaces. One of about 20 SEIU UHW members working the night shift in the Food and Nutrition department, Vargas gathers the troops before they begin to wash dinner trays and deliver late meals to patients.

Assistant Department Administrator Patricia Villareal and her union partner Amelia Cervantes review new data on the team’s improvement projects, such as cooking less soup on weekends so less is wasted, and give a reminder about clocking in accurately.

The huddle ends with a team cheer—“Work hard, stay positive!”—and with that, food service kitchen worker Nancy Rudeas, an SEIU UHW member, and a colleague scurry off to prepare two late dinner trays. They double-check to see that a patient’s special request for green tea is being filled (it is).

“I love doing this,” Rudeas says, heading up on the elevator.

A few late tray deliveries have become a fact of life for the department, a consequence of abandoning set meal times in favor of a “room service” model: Patients simply make a phone call when they are ready for a meal, just like a hotel guest might.

This patient-centered innovation meant the workflow changed. Foreseeable peaks and valleys in cooking and cleaning became a less predictable, variable demand. Tasks that once had been the domain of one shift or the other “leaked” into the next shift. Tensions rose among employees as the distribution of work was thrown into flux.

“Because we have a UBT, we could sit down together and ask, ‘How can we get this resolved?’ ” says Villareal.

Together, the team experimented with adjusting start times for different jobs in the department until it settled on a mix that’s working. “The morning picks up for the night shift, and the night shift picks up for the morning,” she says.

From OK to great

The department set out to improve its customer service scores in September 2008. Though a respectable 86.7 percent of patients surveyed agreed with the statement “the people serving my meals were polite and professional,” that was nonetheless among the lowest scores in the Southern California region.

Together, the UBT members came up with a script that encourages food service workers to introduce themselves by name, ask if they can open any containers, and—most crucially—ask if there is anything else they can get for the patients. By consistently using the script, by October 2010, the score shot up to 99 percent.

Night-shift workers like Rudeas have contributed to that success. The shifts share information in huddles and bulletin boards.

“What goes on during the day, we know at night,” she says. “And what goes on at night, they know during the day.”

A SWEEPING SUCCESS

The Environmental Services department at Riverside Medical Center is continuing its winning streak: In 2010, it went 260 days without a workplace injury. The UBT received a huge banner congratulating it on the achievement, and the co-leads thought it would be nice if each team member signed it before hanging it up.

The banner remained out for a few days to make sure all staffers had a chance to sign—including the workers who come in at 11 p.m. for the graveyard shift. Only then was the banner hung up on the unit wall.

“This made a huge difference,” says Angel Pacheco, who will become the new management co-lead in May and who himself works the night shift. “This actually shows that everyone is involved and can take pride and ownership.” After all, performance metrics are measured by department, not shift, and night shift workers contributed to creating a safer workplace as much as their day shift counterparts.

The EVS team posts a flipchart sheet after every monthly UBT meeting with three to four important items of information to pass on to the rest of the staff. Each shift reviews the sheet at a daily huddle held at the beginning of each shift. The quick review of UBT business, including key performance metrics, follows the team’s stretching exercises that have helped reduce workplace injuries and won it recognition throughout KP.

The sheet hangs on the door of the supply closet, where each staff member comes when starting work to get carts, trash bags and keys to the offices they have to clean. This strategic placement ensures workers from all shifts have access to the daily UBT updates.

Face time matters

Face-to-face communication augments written communication and helps build the camaraderie that helps teams improve performance. For instance, Pacheco makes a point of visiting the night workers in the outlying medical office buildings—he drives an hour to Temecula to see one employee.

“It’s worth it,” he says. “I just take the time to reflect on things.”

Paula Cunningham, an EVS attendant and member of Steelworkers Local 7600, is one of four union members on the 6 p.m. to 2 a.m. shift responsible for passing information from the UBT’s representative group meeting to her shift colleagues.

“They trust us to deliver the information to them,” says Cunningham, whose work schedule is adjusted so she can attend representative group meetings in the early afternoon. “We talk frequently and rely heavily on huddles.” Other night shift workers also rotate into the group’s meetings.

Because he’s an on-call employee, Robert Casillas works all the shifts, so he has insights into what makes each shift unique.

The morning shift is more hectic, he says. The evening work is much calmer. More people are cleaning sections solo, but they pass one another in the hallways and share information with each other then.

“We have our communications plan, which we share with the other staff,” Casillas says. “We don’t want anyone to think we’re hiding stuff. And when the information comes from us, it’s less like a demand from management. It’s more about figuring out ideas to help us do our work.”

Sometimes, seeing the hospital at the end of the day as they do, it is night shift employees who spur the entire department into action.

The night workers noticed the hospital was running low on privacy curtains. When the ones soiled during the day were taken down, there were not enough from the laundry to replace them. Cunningham brought the information to the representative group, and the co-leads secured more curtains.

“What affects the night shift,” she says, “usually affects all of us.”

 

Obsolete (webmaster)
Migrated
not migrated

Many Small UBTs Do What One Large One Can’t

Submitted by Andrea Buffa on Wed, 11/17/2010 - 15:20
Taxonomy upgrade extras
Request Number
sty_NCAL_charitablehealth
Long Teaser

When Charitable Health Coverage switched from having one large UBT to having several smaller ones, it struck upon a formula for success. For the first time, the department processed every application in time for insurance coverage to begin on the first of the following month.

Communicator (reporters)
Non-LMP
Editor (if known, reporters)
Tyra Ferlatte
Notes (as needed)
I will find a photo from the photo library.
Photos & Artwork (reporters)
Only use image in listings (editors)
not listing only
Status
Released
Tracking (editors)
Story content (editors)
Headline (for informational purposes only)
Many small UBTs do what one large one can’t
Deck
The Charitable Health Coverage Operations department reorganizes—and achieves a goal that had eluded it for years
Story body part 1

The employees in Charitable Health Coverage Operations (CHCO) felt good about their Northern California department’s mission—but not so good about how long it took sometimes to help the thousands of low-income children who benefit from KP-subsidized health care.

The department handles the eligibility paperwork for a KP program that provides health coverage to people who don’t qualify for employer-based health coverage or public programs like Medicaid. At the team’s low point in 2005, it had a six-month applications backlog.

“Our primary customers are children,” said Nancy Waring, CHCO customer care manager. “We have over 80,000 children, most of them low income. About 50 percent of our population is Spanish speaking. And the program is completely subsidized by Kaiser.”

Too large a group

In the past, one representative unit-based team encompassed the whole department.  Because employees within the same department were doing very different types of work—processing mail, entering data, processing enrollments, providing customer service, and servicing the regions outside of California—they didn’t share a single set of problems. So the UBT tended to work on departmentwide problems like attendance.

But the single UBT struggled.

 “We basically failed from 2006 to 2009 to do anything,” says Suber Corley, the department’s director, “simply because we were looking at too large a group trying to solve too large a problem.”

So they reorganized. The department now has five UBTs that correspond with employees’ functions.

Setting priorities

The smaller teams set their sites on a number of changes, but they also coordinated with each other on one common goal: to process every application by the 20th of the month.

In their UBT, the mail-room employees decided to look at priorities differently.

“We identified that what we really needed to do was to have a prioritization scheme for every week of the month,” says Victor Romero, CHCO operations manager. He explains that during the first week of January, a recertification application that’s due on April 1 would be low priority in the mail room, whereas a new application—which would need to be processed by January 20 for insurance coverage to begin on February 1—would be high priority. After the 20th, attention moves to the low-priority documents.

The data entry, scanning and enrollment UBTs came up with other solutions, too.

“We instituted several changes in how the application is handled,” says Carl Artis, an enrollment processor team lead and OPEIU Local 29 shop steward. “If we couldn’t process an application, the application was sent back to the customers very early so they could make necessary corrections. We also streamlined our process—there were some things we were doing twice, which wasn’t necessary.”

Artis emphasizes that the changes were developed jointly by frontline workers and managers.

“I have to admit they (the managers) have some really great ideas,” he says, “and they were really able to listen to some great ideas.”

It worked. In October, for the first time in the department’s history, the team was able to process all its new applications by the 20th, so coverage for those applicants could start in November.

“The end result is that poor children did not go without health coverage,” Romero says.

Addressing burnout

In addition to the project to reduce the amount of time it takes to process new applications, the smaller teams have taken on other projects, like reducing burnout among customer service agents who spend all day answering phone calls. They’ve also done charity work together, raising funds to provide school supplies for low-income students at a local high school.

Artis passes on the story of his department’s flourishing UBTs to other members of Local 29.

“I’ve heard some people say, ‘Oh, that’s too much work to take on,’ or, ‘We don’t have the resources we need to address the issue’ or ‘Management would never go for that,’ ” Artis says. “But what I’ve learned is—just try it, and don’t be afraid to fail.”

Obsolete (webmaster)
Region
Northern California
Vehicle/venue
lmpartnership.org
Migrated
not migrated

Game Changer: Putting the Patient First

Submitted by tyra.l.ferlatte on Mon, 10/18/2010 - 16:21
Topics
Taxonomy upgrade extras
Request Number
sty_gamechanger_hankcoverstory_fall2010
Long Teaser

A team in South San Francisco that improved the surgery-scheduling process for patients and teams in San Diego that took a hard look at their service scores demonstrate what things look like when teams truly consider what's best for the patient as they make decisions.

Communicator (reporters)
Non-LMP
Notes (as needed)
note: there are links in "highlighted stories and tools" section.

caption for second photo (hank25_coverstory3):
Streamlining the process: The new pre-surgery checklist developed by a South San Francisco UBT has helped patients and improved communication for everyone involved. Dr. Brian Tzeng (center) helped lead the work.

caption for third photo (hank25_coverstory6):
Improving service: Terry Caballero, a surgery scheduler and SEIU UHW member, helped spark the work that led to a streamlined surgery-scheduling process.
Photos & Artwork (reporters)
Making things easier: Members of a San Diego Medical Center turn team help KP patient Deborah Allen shift in her bed.
Only use image in listings (editors)
not listing only
Highlighted stories and tools (reporters)
Benefits to teamwork

In South San Francisco, Dr. Brian Tzeng, who’s an anesthesiologist, and others on the team say that working on the project through the unit-based team allowed them to understand each others’ roles and responsibilities better—and also gave them an opportunity to hear and contribute an opinion from that perspective.

“One of the great benefits of this group was it was an outlet for multiple providers at different levels to voice their concerns and actually be heard,” Dr. Tzeng explains. “The greatest frustration for many individuals is we all had great ideas but didn’t know how to make that happen. We realized through this group we had a means to make those changes.”

Dr. Tzeng is certain the team’s accomplishments are the result of every team member’s commitment to working out the best solution in the patient’s best interest. There were no politics, just concern for the member.

“To us, this is not a job,” says Debbie Taylor. “We come here to serve a patient.”

And what about Caballero’s initial concern, that patients weren’t getting enough advance notice about when they have to be at the hospital? The team has been slowly chipping away on that as well. In October, they expect to start giving patients two days’ advance notice of their arrival time at the hospital.

Status
Released
Tracking (editors)
Story content (editors)
Headline (for informational purposes only)
Game changer: Putting the patient first
Deck
Teams in South San Francisco and San Diego work to keep patients front and center
Story body part 1

What happens when teams truly walk a mile in their patients’ shoes? They often discover their own actions are making that mile a rocky one for patients—and as a result make huge breakthroughs in the way they deliver care.

In the case of South San Francisco’s multidepartmental pre-admission team, observing their processes from the other side of the gurney spurred them to dramatically streamline the pre-surgery and admitting process for patients. With the member at the forefront of their thinking, the team members turned a two-inch-thick packet of confusing, redundant information into a streamlined, one-page checklist. And a funny thing happened—while redesigning the process to help patients, the team improved the way it works.

“Patients would often get confused and weren’t sure what the next step in the process was,” says Brian Tzeng, MD, the Peri-operative Medicine director. “We realized we didn’t have a clear path for the patient to follow.”

Other teams throughout Kaiser Permanente are making similar realizations, framing their performance improvement work by asking the question, “What’s best for the patient?” If a possible solution doesn’t work well for the member and patient, then there’s more brainstorming to be done. These teams are taking the Value Compass to heart—organizing their work not just around the four points but examining what they’re doing from the patient’s perspective.

What does that mean for frontline teams? At the San Diego Medical Center, the Emergency Department sees up to 300 patients every 24 hours. Physicians and staff members are always on the go, delivering on the ultimate bottom line—saved lives. What could be more important? Clinical quality is high; patients are seen in a timely manner and the rate of unscheduled return visits is good.

Yet the results of a recent patient satisfaction survey bothered the team. The department scored well overall, but their patients gave it only 63 percent approval on one question: While you were in the Emergency Department, were you kept informed about how long the treatment would take?

Obsolete (webmaster)
Region
Northern California
Southern California
Vehicle/venue
hank
Migrated
not migrated

KP Readiness-for-Spread Assessment

Submitted by kevino on Wed, 08/04/2010 - 15:57
Tool Type
Format
Topics
Taxonomy upgrade extras
KP Readiness-for-Spread Assessment

This tool, developed by the Department of Care and Service Quality, is designed to help KP in spreading successful practices widely.

Non-LMP
Tyra Ferlatte
Tool landing page copy (reporters)
Readiness-for-Spread Assessment

Format:
Word document

Size:
Six pages

Intended audience:
Senior leaders, facilitators and consultants, UBT co-leads

Best used: Use this checklist to assess whether your team’s successful practice is ready to disseminate across KP.

 

 

Released
Tracking (editors)
Obsolete (webmaster)
other
DOC
lmpartnership.org
not migrated

10 Proven Practices for Reducing Injuries

Submitted by Kristi on Sat, 07/10/2010 - 19:10
Tool Type
Format
Role
Taxonomy upgrade extras
10 Proven Practices for Reducing Injuries

This 11-page presentation can be shown at meetings, or individual tips can be shared in huddles and other gatherings.

Non-LMP
Tool landing page copy (reporters)
10 Proven Practices for Reducing Injuries

Format:
PDF

Size:
8.5" x 11"

Intended audience:
Managers, Workplace Safety staff and unit-based teams working on reducing the number of workplace injuries

Best used:
Share this 11-page presentation of proven safety practices at meetings, in huddles and at other gatherings to accelerate improvement in workplace safety. 

 

Released
Tracking (editors)
Classification (webmaster)
Workplace Safety
Obsolete (webmaster)
PDF
lmpartnership.org
not migrated

Seven Principles for Work Groups

Submitted by Kristi on Sun, 06/20/2010 - 19:33
Tool Type
Format
Topics
Taxonomy upgrade extras
Seven Principles for Work Groups

A list of seven key principles for effective work groups. Managers and union stewards can refer to it for their joint responsibilities.

Tyra Ferlatte
Tool landing page copy (reporters)

Format:
PDF

Size:
8.5 x 11

Intended Audience:
UBT co-leads, managers and union stewards

Best used:
A list of seven key principles for effective work groups. Managers and union stewards can refer to it for their joint responsibilities.

Released
Tracking (editors)
Obsolete (webmaster)
PDF
lmpartnership.org
not migrated