Agreement/Trust - Color

On a warm fall afternoon, nearly 35 children are bouncing off the walls as they get ready to leave the classroom and head out to their elementary school’s garden. They’re all members of an after-school garden club and cooking class called Edible Olympic. It’s the brainchild of Maria Peyer, an oncology nurse and team co-lead at the Longview Kelso Medical Office in Kaiser Permanente’s Northwest region and her husband, elementary school teacher Michael Bixby.

The kids can barely contain their excitement as Bixby tries to calm them down so they can listen to the afternoon’s agenda.

“The sooner you settle down and be quiet, the quicker I can finish what I need to say and you can get outside,” he implores the class.

Quickly, the hubbub settles. Bixby goes over what needs to be done: plant blueberry bushes, dig a hole for a tree, and remove bamboo sticks. He also reviews the Garden Guidelines, which include listening with respect, walking (no running) in the garden, and asking for permission before picking anything. Then he asks, “Whose garden is it?” and gets a resounding and loud, “Ours!” as everyone heads outside to get to work.

The students attend Olympic Elementary School in Longview, Washington. They don’t have many advantages: More than 20 percent of the city’s population is below the federal poverty line, and 90 percent of the school’s students participate in the free or reduced-price lunch program. Many experience food insecurity regularly, not knowing if they’ll have enough—or any—food to eat.

Income-related health disparities

There are well-documented health disparities related to low income, and these kids are at risk. Edible Olympic is helping address that vulnerability, teaching the kids about healthy food and how to prepare it, laying the foundation for good eating habits that last a lifetime. It’s an example of how partnership principles expand naturally and necessarily into the community; the new 2015 National Agreement includes commitments to jointly work on improving the health of the communities we serve.

The Longview project grew out of a Kaiser Permanente adult cooking class recommended for oncology patients, one that focuses on a plant-based diet. Peyer says that after moving to Longview, she and her husband were struck by the limited resources available to the children in the community.

“We wanted to affect change as directly as possible,” says Peyer, an OFNHP/ONA member. “So we dove headfirst into Edible Olympic. We didn’t want to spend time in meetings, we just wanted to get in the dirt and the kitchen—and that’s what we did.”

She sought support from Thriving Schools, one of Kaiser Permanente’s Community Benefit programs. She forged partnerships with the school’s Parent-Teacher Organization and the Lower Columbia School Gardens, a nonprofit that helps schools create garden programs. Local stores donated money. High school students from Longview and Portland also are participating.

“The kids, their parents and the greater community have embraced the efforts and confirmed that our hunches were right,” Peyer says.  “Good, healthy, real food, prepared simply, with love and in community, can be life transforming.”

Members of the Oncology unit-based team are supporting the project, too, donating money and time; four KP employees help staff the cooking class.

“Volunteering in the community gives us at KP a chance to share our skills and our approach to supporting good health,” says Elizabeth Engberg, the Northwest’s Thriving Schools program manager. “It also helps us learn about our members—where they live, work, learn and play, because that’s a huge part of what affects their health. Schools are the best place to do this.”

Overwhelming participation

The program has had overwhelming and unexpected participation.

“The idea was that this project would launch with eight to 10 kids. We had 60 kids come to the information session,” Peyer says, which prompted an instant expansion from one to two sessions. The kids work in the garden on Thursday afternoons, and on Fridays, they walk across the field to the middle school, where they are able to use the home economics classroom for cooking class. The sessions run for five weeks and end with a celebration where the kids cook a complete meal and share with their friends and family.

The first session got under way last spring. A grassy patch of the school’s property was selected as the site for the garden, and the children got seeds started indoors. As weather allowed, the ground was prepared. While they waited for their seedlings to be ready to plant, the kids were introduced to kitchen safety and how to prepare the food they were just beginning to grow.

In the cooking class, kids have a healthy snack, then work in small groups to prepare the dish of the week. When the cooking is done, they gather together  and enjoy their meal. The kids leave with a bag of groceries so they can cook the meal at home.

“In some cases, this may be the healthiest meal the family may eat during the week,” Peyer says.

On that fall day out in the garden, the kids in the second session organized quickly after studying the garden map Bixby brought along for reference. They divided themselves into groups and got to work with shovels, buckets and plants to complete the day’s activities.

One of the choices they faced was whether to extend the blueberries to the fence or stop a few feet in to allow for a foot path. Several kids piped up with ideas. The decision got made after 11-year-old Christian Aguibar offered his opinion.

“We can grow more things if we don’t have a walkway,” Christian said, “so let’s not have one.”

For the first five years after the Permanente Foundation Health Plan opened to the public, there were no separate regions. Three hospitals—two in Northern California and one at the Fontana steel mill in Southern California—served the new members.

Northern California

The Oakland hospital opened on Aug. 21, 1942, and the Richmond hospital opened nine days later. Once the plan went public, the International Longshoremen and Warehousemen’s Union and other unions were prominent among the early member groups. Oakland city employees, union typographers, street car drivers and carpenters also embraced the plan. In 1953, state-of-the-art hospitals opened in San Francisco and Walnut Creek, as well as Los Angeles. Today, three union locals in Northern California belong to the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions: SEIU-UHW (28,800 members), OPEIU Local 29 (2,400 members) and IFPTE Local 20 (1,300 members).

Southern California

Harry Bridges, the ILWU president, wanted a hospital in the San Pedro area in 1949, and it was his promise of a large and stable membership that convinced health plan leaders to expand. He proved as good as his word, and KP became the sole supplier of medical care to ILWU’s 6,000 West Coast members. The Southern California Permanente Group was established in 1950. In 1951, the 15,000 members of the Retail Clerks Union Local 770 in Los Angeles, at the time the largest local in the country, joined the plan. Today, there are 13 coalition locals in Southern California: SEIU-UHW (18,000 members); UNAC/UHCP (16,000); United Steelworkers Local 7600 (6,000); OPEIU Local 30 (4,000); UFCW locals 770 (a descendant of the clerks union), 324, 135, 1428, 1442 and 1167 (3,860 total); Teamsters Local 166 (500); KPNAA (350); and SEIU Local 121RN (200).

Northwest

Health plan enrollment opened to the community in 1947 with the opening of an outpatient facility across the Columbia River from the closed Kaiser shipyards. It became a region in 1951 and has been at the forefront of several innovative practices. In 1964, it launched the Center for Health Research to advance evidence-based medicine. In 1974, it became the only KP region to provide prepaid dental services. In 1991, the Northwest started Kaiser-on-the-Job, a workers’ compensation program that has since spread to all regions. Coalition locals in the Northwest are: OFNHP/ONA (3,400), SEIU Local 49 (3,900), UFCW Local 555 (900) and ILWU Local 28 (65).

Hawaii

Hawaii opened in 1958—before the territory became a state—with strong support from the building and construction trades, which benefited strongly from Henry Kaiser’s hotel and housing projects. It was the last region to join the partnership, in 2009. The Hawaii Nurses Association, OPEIU Local 50 (800 members), belongs to the coalition.

Ohio

The Ohio region was the first organizational expansion of the health plan outside the western United States. The Community Health Foundation in Cleveland—which had been established by the Meatcutters and Retail Store Employees Union and had a structure similar to KP’s—merged with Kaiser Permanente in 1969 to form the Kaiser Community Health Foundation. The region left KP in 2013.

Colorado

Colorado also joined Kaiser Permanente in 1969, after requests from a group of labor, medical, university and government leaders. The United Mine Workers had regional headquarters in Denver, and Kaiser Permanente had longstanding relations with UMW through the Kabat Kaiser Institute in Vallejo, later known as the Kaiser Foundation Rehabilitation Center, where injured miners were treated. Today, SEIU Local 105 (3,500 members), UFCW Local 7 (1,800) and IUOE Local 1 (23) belong to the union coalition.

Mid-Atlantic States

In 1980, KP acquired the failing Georgetown Community Health Plan and, through the use of existing community hospitals, began to operate profitably within two years. Kaiser Permanente believed locating in the Washington, D.C., area would provide high visibility regarding health care legislation. The effort was successful: In 1992, Jim Doherty, president of the Group Health Association of America, the professional organization for HMOs, remarked that the move “did more for the HMO movement than any single act since the HMO Act of 1973.” In 1984, the region opened its first pharmacy and changed its name to Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States. In 1996, it acquired Humana Group Health Inc., one of the country’s oldest HMOs. OPEIU Local 2 (3,800 members) and UFCW locals 400 and 27 (1,600 total) belong to the coalition.

Georgia

The Georgia region opened in 1985. Its first medical director was Harper Gaston, MD,
a Northern California physician and Georgia native who was proud to return home and serve the initial 265 members. In 1988, the region experienced dramatic growth when the state of Georgia came aboard as a major account and Kaiser Permanente acquired the financially ailing Maxicare Georgia HMO; within a year, the region celebrated its 100,000th member milestone. UFCW Local 1996 (1,800 members) is part of the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions.

Visit Kaiser Permanente's 70th anniversary mini-site.

Fists pounding on tables, demands, showdowns, strikes. So went traditional collective bargaining: Each side fighting for a bigger slice of the same pie. Each side gunning for a narrowly drawn agreement on pay and working conditions, leaving mutual concerns about patient care, quality and affordability unaddressed.

But Kaiser Permanente and the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions abandoned the traditional approach in 1997, when they founded the Labor Management Partnership.

Our negotiations feature committees, observers and flip charts of options. Since 2000, KP workers, managers and physicians have worked together to craft four National Agreements and one reopener amid relative labor peace. On March 30, some 150 representatives will begin to negotiate a fifth agreement. Assuming all goes according to schedule, the new contract for the 100,000 workers represented by 28 locals in the coalition will be ready to go into effect when the 2012 National Agreement expires Sept. 30.

In an age of growing health care costs and increased competition, the joint goal is to provide our health plan members and patients with better, faster, less expensive and more personal care and to maintain and improve the best health care jobs in the United States.

“Interest-based bargaining is not a utopia and not always a win-win. It’s taken Kaiser and the unions a lot of hard work to get where they are,” says Linda Gonzales, director of mediation services for the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, Southwest Region. “[But] to resolve difficult issues in partnership is a strength.”

Because of interest-based bargaining, Kaiser Permanente and the Coalition of KP Unions have been able to go well beyond wages and benefits—the subjects of traditional bargaining—in  negotiating four program-wide contracts. These National Agreements have developed industry-leading approaches to worker sick leave, safety and training and workforce development. They have created unit-based teams to improve patient care and service, set standards to hold teams and their sponsors accountable, and pioneered programs for the mutual growth of KP and the unions.  

Interest-based bargaining pays off in other ways as well.

“To understand one another’s interests, you have to engage in inquiry and listening, and you have to resist jumping to conclusions about the other party’s intentions,” says Harvard Business School Professor Amy Edmondson. “Doing this develops leaders who better understand how the organization works.”

“People in health care look to Kaiser Permanente as the showcase for working together,” says Gonzales, who helped facilitate bargaining for the first National Agreement in 2000.

The mediation service last year recognized a handful of cases of successful interest-based bargaining. Our Labor Management Partnership was one of them.

Picture a large room with 150 people. Hands are raised. Everyone gets heard. It is pushing midnight and exhaustion is setting in, but everyone maintains a sense of mutual respect and serious purpose.

It’s not the United Nations but the Common Issues Committee (CIC). The CIC is a representative group—made up of Kaiser Permanente workers, managers and physicians as well as delegates from the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions—who take on the responsibility of negotiating a new National Agreement. The program-wide labor contract covers the 28 locals in the union coalition.

This inclusion is part of what makes our negotiations different from other labor contract negotiations—because how we bargain greatly affects what we bargain. By seating RNs and regional health plan presidents with lab techs and program managers during negotiations, interest-based bargaining at KP opens up new issues for discussion and creates deeper support for the final agreement.

“I personally learned a lot from the different perspectives voiced by all of the individuals representing their fields,” says Dr. Varoujan Altebarmakian, a medical group representative on the 2012 CIC. What he learned during bargaining, he says, made him an even more active advocate for partnership at Fresno Medical Center, where he is physician-in-chief.

A new CIC is formed each bargaining year. KP and union leaders select members and assign each to a subgroup to address a topic area. This year, those topics are expected to include Total Health, Work of the Future, and Operational and Service Excellence in Partnership.

Each subgroup is co-led by a management and union representative. Instead of taking hard-line positions, subgroup members stake out their common interests. Over the course of five bargaining sessions, assisted by outside facilitators, they identify interests and develop options.

In 2010, that process led to development of the Path to Performance, which established a uniform way of rating UBTs. “It was a defining moment in partnership,” says LaMont Stone, a labor liaison for Local 29 in Northern California who participated in 2010 and 2012 bargaining. “Before it was case by case, region by region.”

At the final bargaining session, each subgroup brings its proposals to the full CIC for discussion and agreement; the full CIC also negotiates wages and benefits. The finalized contract then goes to KP management for approval and is ratified by the members of each local in the union coalition.

When I was asked to serve on the national bargaining team in 2012, I was a newbie. I had never done bargaining before and didn’t know what interest-based bargaining was. I quickly learned it is a skill that would serve me well, both in the bargaining sessions and in my career beyond that event.

Bargaining began with a significant investment from the company providing both labor and management representatives with education sessions to understand interest-based bargaining. Part of this education was to understand the landscape of Kaiser Permanente and how we were doing in the industry. It also included a look at the future, as well as the history of KP and the value of the partnership. Bernard Tyson (KP’s chairman and CEO) made it clear that partnership is an asset to KP and it wasn’t going away.

I worked on the Growth team, which was to find ways to help grow KP and union membership. We practiced together with scenarios, using the interest-based problem solving tools—a great way for the team members to start to trust each other.

As we went through the process, there were times we disagreed, and we worked through that. Getting through those tough conversations really showed that although we might be coming from a different place, we had the same commitment and common interests.

One of the interesting aspects of working with a national team was meeting folks from across the KP program. Although I am from Colorado, it was interesting to see that the concerns we had from our region were similar to those of Mid-Atlantic States.

I was a little concerned going into the process that we’d get stuck on some of the local issues. When specific regional issues came forward, we were able to quickly work through them and refocus. I was impressed with my labor partners, who really helped us move from the local issues to the strategic.

Honestly, there were times when I wondered if we were going to be able to get through it. The process was a reaffirmation that we are all on the same page. Other companies haven’t been able to do what we do. We stumble and fall back on traditional methods at times, but there is power in the KP model of how we do things.

When I was asked to represent The Permanente Medical Group at 2012 bargaining, I leapt at the opportunity. My own experience with partnership at Fresno Medical Center showed me what great things could be accomplished with collective problem solving.

I sat on the subgroup that looked at how to improve partnership to enhance performance and Kaiser Permanente’s operational agility. I was amazed at seeing so many people with different backgrounds sharing their thoughts and shaping the outcomes. From the highest levels of Kaiser Permanente and union leadership to the front line, everybody was around the table, and they were all equal in this venue. Everyone was heard and engaged.

I personally learned a lot from the different perspectives voiced by all of the individuals representing their fields. I strongly believe that collective wisdom is better than individual wisdom, and that with collective wisdom you can achieve anything in life. Interest-based bargaining, which assembles voices from all levels and reaches of Kaiser Permanente, is a great example of collective wisdom.

Another thing that struck me—how much folks craved the physician perspective. When I spoke, all 25 to 30 people in that subgroup really listened. And there were issues where a physician perspective was critical. That was a strong message I brought back to physicians. In most unit-based teams at Fresno, there is physician involvement. The intention is to bring those perspectives together to enhance the care for our members and patients. But does that mean if I walk into a UBT meeting I’ll see a doctor? Maybe yes, maybe no.

I’ve worked at Kaiser Permanente for 34 years, and I saw the pre-partnership years. They were contentious ones. We’ve had relative peace with coalition unions since partnership. That’s not to say that working in partnership is perfect in every way. It can’t be done without trusting each other. And how do you develop trust? Through transparency. The whole bargaining process was about transparency; essentially, everybody could share everything. That doesn’t mean people didn’t disagree.

The interest-based, collective approach takes into account everyone’s perspectives to reach a better outcome, which is ultimately a common goal—superior care for our members and patients.

I just used interest-based problem solving (IBPS) while I was at a union convention in Philadelphia. We got five people to rent a car together and go sightseeing on our one day off. So we had to decide what to do in Philadelphia for 24 hours. We brainstormed, then identified the ideas we all supported. We went to Valley Forge, Amish country and the boardwalk in Atlantic City. It worked great.

My husband and I used interest-based problem solving to make a decision about a major purchase recently. I used IBPS to get to “yes.” IBPS is the easiest way to organize your mind. My mind automatically goes to it and that whole process. If a conversation gets confusing, you can go back to the structure provided by it.

Being at a round table with interest-based problem solving is the best way to move health care forward. What we do at the bargaining table with IBPS is great, but we need to do a better job bringing that back to the workplace. We can make it better by having more frontline managers at the bargaining table.

Frontline managers, especially the newer ones, need a sense of the history and commitment of our National Agreement. And frontline managers need more support. There are still problems with backfill, with allowing employees to be involved in LMP activities.

The way we do business at Kaiser Permanente is the Labor Management Partnership, so we need to have those interest-based discussions. I’ve been involved in 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2012 bargaining. I am in awe of the great work labor and management representatives do—and how we can come up with common goals in a nonadversarial manner. I hope we all see it as a value.

A former KP administrator, Michael Belmont now works for Restructuring Associates Inc., the consulting firm that helped during the creation and initial implementation of the Labor Management Partnership and that now helps facilitate national bargaining. He sees interest-based bargaining as a way to solve the problems of the future, before they arise, instead of getting stuck dealing with the baggage of past grievances.

My time at Kaiser Permanente dates back to the late 1980s. I was assistant hospital administrator in Panorama City, dealing with several unions. We were facing so much discord. It was all-encompassing, and it took the focus off improvement issues. The move toward interest-based bargaining and [the] Labor Management Partnership allowed us to put the focus on improving the member experience instead of continually trying to resolve labor problems.

Partnership, especially interest-based bargaining, gives employees and their unions a chance to have an impact on things they might not otherwise. They have a say beyond wages, hours and working conditions. In 2012, there was a bargaining subgroup on growth, focusing both on growing Kaiser Permanente and the unions. In a traditional setting, that doesn’t happen. For employees and their unions, the other side of the interest-based process is responsibility and accountability to take on and help solve the problems of the organization.

When we do trainings on interest-based problem solving, people will say, “This is how I deal with relationships.” If you are going to be a good partner—and have a successful relationship with a partner, kids, friends—you have to have your partner’s interests in mind as well as your own. Making this connection helps people connect the strategy to their work lives.

After 2000 bargaining, the Southern California region was looking for a change in labor relations, away from traditional, toward partnership. We were trying to move labor relations away from being a wall between the unions and management and toward facilitating a productive relationship between unions and management. I saw a gradual transition toward more of a partnering role. I left KP in 2006. I could come back [with Restructuring Associates] as a neutral [party] in 2010 and 2012 because of the [nature of the previous] relationships with union and management officials.

Interest-based bargaining is focused on solving problems up front rather than on grievances. People have to unlearn a lot of habits and build a lot of trust. There was 50 years of baggage [when the partnership started]. A traditional approach leaves lots of scars. Traditional is the comfort zone for most organizations. Traditional approaches are backwards looking: They are about solving problems from the past that pile up and wait for bargaining. Interest-based bargaining is about solving problems and issues that may come up in the future. Using the interest-based approach in bargaining and in day-to-day work is a much more forward-looking way to solve problems—and so much more effective.

No one does it like we do.

Our negotiations for a new National Agreement will be one of the largest private-sector contract talks in the United States this year. No one else brings together such a large and diverse group of representatives from labor and management—plus physicians—to arrive at a single contract for so many union locals nationwide.

We’re so accustomed to this being our norm, it’s easy to forget how revolutionary our Labor Management Partnership is—and how democratic our interest-based methods are.

“At the table, everyone has an equal right to speak and explain their interest,” says Linda Gonzales of the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, which helps facilitate the negotiations. “There’s more open dialogue and sharing of information.”

The tone set by interest-based bargaining carries over to the work of unit-based teams. UBTs were one of the outcomes of 2005 bargaining. Today, they are the engine for performance improvement at Kaiser Permanente. They are also the structure giving frontline workers a voice in making decisions. The work UBTs do to improve care for KP members wouldn’t be happening if partnership weren’t in place, and if each successive national agreement didn’t commit everyone to finding innovative ways to address common interests.

It’s not always smooth sailing. But the interest-based model grounds everyone in shared values.

“There are some hard issues, and bargaining still has to take place,” says Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, a professor at the Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations at the University of Illinois. “At the end of the day, you have to find the right balance.”