Share/Speak Up - Color

“Dexter” Janet Borrowman is an operational excellence coach for performance improvement in the Southern California Region. She recently spoke with LMP Communications manager Sherry Crosby about the importance of rounding conversations for managers and frontline workers. Building a workplace culture where everyone’s voice matters is key to our Labor Management Partnership.

What is rounding?

Rounding is an evidence-based practice that relies on purposeful conversation and observation to drive workplace engagement and insights. Direct report rounding involves conversations between a team member and that person’s supervisor, manager or leader.

How does rounding benefit managers and frontline workers?

When done well, rounding helps managers build trust with staff, gain insights into workplace challenges and recognize employees, which fosters joy in work. Frontline workers benefit by having a chance to connect individually with their managers, share ideas, express concerns and find deeper purpose in their everyday work.

What evidence shows rounding is an effective practice?

Rounding is one of the most effective ways for managers to spend their time. And the more they consistently round, the greater the impact. According to People Pulse, departments where rounding is routinely practiced achieve more meaningful levels of engagement, better patient care outcomes, fewer workplace injuries and improved attendance.

How can frontline workers get the most out of rounding conversations?

Sometimes employees don’t see the benefit of direct report rounding; they just see it as helping the boss complete their checklist. It’s totally missing the point! Rounding is your chance to discuss what you need to be successful and the support you need. This is all about you!

How can managers get the most out of rounding conversations?

Rounding is one of the best tools that managers have for proactively surfacing and addressing issues which can create safer, more efficient and productive teams and environments. Use rounding to connect with your team members. People need to feel that their life and work has meaning, and that they are personally supported and cared for as a complete person. People need a personal touch, especially during difficult times, and rounding can help with that.

How can managers use rounding to build trusting relationships?

Your direct reports need to feel that what they’re saying is important and that you’re following up with action. Circle back to that person who brought up the issue with you. Go to the huddle and follow up with the whole team. We build trust by following up after a rounding conversation. We break trust by not following up.

What advice do you have for those who want to enhance their rounding practice?

If we are doing rounding the right way, if we’re doing it consistently, if we’re doing it authentically, then we will discover what matters most to our people and we’ll be able to better support them and the work they do.

Alaine Lounsbury, RN, is proud of her nursing team at Downey Medical Center in Southern California. 4 West team members have worked together for decades, forming bonds that have led to high patient satisfaction rates and region-wide recognition.

Lounsbury, nursing assistant clinical director, attributes the team's success to rounding — the practice of engaging frontline workers in face-to-face conversations on the floor and listening to their concerns. Managers who round say it helps build a culture of engagement and dialogue, a key goal of the Labor Management Partnership between Kaiser Permanente and the Partnership unions. 

“It’s about making a connection,” explains Lounsbury, who rounds quarterly on 90-plus staff members using Kaiser Permanente’s Rounding Plus online tool [KP Intranet]. “You want to hear the good with the bad.”

Removing roadblocks

With the tool, managers can use their mobile device to identify, track and escalate issues surfaced during rounding conversations. Program-wide, nearly 10,000 leaders and managers use the program.

At Downey, nurses used rounding conversations to speak up about a workflow issue. Because 4 West is the only unit with nurses qualified to give chemotherapy to adults, it meant staff members sometimes had to leave their department to administer drugs to patients. Their frequent absences meant more work for others.

“I heard them in rounding say, ‘You need to figure this out,’” recalls Lounsbury. She and her team developed new protocols to enable others outside the unit to give the medication. “That was a big satisfier.”

Getting visual

To help her systematically follow up and act on her team’s questions and concerns, Lounsbury uses a colorful poster, called the Stoplight Report, that assigns green, yellow and red colors to track the status of issues.

The poster was conceived by Downey Quality Coordinator Suxian Hu, RN, based on the color-coded reports managers receive through the Rounding Plus program. Last year, all of Downey’s inpatient nursing units began using it.

In 4 West, the poster hangs prominently in the conference room, where everyone can see it.

“Staff members know something is being done,” says Donielle Tresvant, RN, a staff nurse and member of UNAC/UHCP, one of the unions in the Alliance of Health Care Unions. “They know they’re being heard.”

Nurses say the information shared on the poster also fosters team communication and collaboration. “It keeps us updated about things at work and it helps us improve our care by being focused,” says Brianna Schneider, RN, a member of UNAC/UHCP. “It makes for a cohesive atmosphere.”

Unit-based teams are getting results — and are finding ways to share their learning with their peers face to face, online or in print. Talk with your team about how to use these and other ideas to share your learning and spread success.

1. Track your progress. UBT Tracker is a web-based tool that helps unit-based teams and consultants collect and report information about their performance improvement work. Our UBT Tracker User Guide can help you make the most of your Tracker entries or search for model projects.
2. Tell your story. Storytelling is one of the best ways  to explain partnership and show others your results. Sign your team up for our storytelling training. 
3. Step right up. UBT fairs are a dynamic forum for spreading effective practices face to face. Hosting your own webinar online lets you reach beyond the walls  of your facility.
4. Lights…camera…take action. Kaiser Permanente’s Care Management Institute uses video ethnography— interviewing KP patients at the care site—to help teams share ideas and keep patients at the centerof performance improvement. To learn more, visit CMI’s Video Ethnography & Storytelling page [KP intranet].
5. Write all about it. Use fliers, posters and newsletters to keep others informed and engaged in your team’s projects. Post your results in the break room. Invite another unit to your huddle for a progress report. Use these templates to create your next newsletter.

Budget-savvy shoppers know you can save money by buying in bulk—even, it turns out, when you’re buying pharmaceuticals. Just ask the team members of the Zion Outpatient Pharmacy in San Diego.

The unit-based team was able to save more than $1 million over five months by buying drugs in quantity and managing specialty medications better. And, adopting a practice that would make Goldilocks happy, the pharmacy now keeps just the right amount—no more, no less—of high-cost meds in stock. Managing costs helps keep expenses down for members, and the team’s improved communication means better service for patients, whose medications are there when they need them.

Not so long ago, the financial picture looked bleak for the 24-hour pharmacy, which serves discharged hospital patients and other members at the bustling Zion Medical Center. Inventory had swollen to more than $3 million. It was a signal the pharmacy had too much stock on hand and wasn’t turning it over frequently enough. 

“We realized that we needed to do something,” says Nathan Close, outpatient pharmacy supervisor and management tri-lead of the 45-member team, which is at Level 4 on the five-point UBT Path to Performance.

Honest assessment

Team members set a five-month goal to reduce their bloated inventory by $600,000, from $3.2 million to $2.6 million, starting in January 2016. 

Their first step was to review the pharmacy’s ordering and inventory practices. Team members quickly realized they were overstocking oral chemotherapy, Hepatitis C and antiviral medications. At $10,000 a bottle, rarely used pharmaceuticals suck up resources when they sit on shelves. Worse, if they aren’t used or returned to the manufacturer before they expire, they’re a costly mistake.

To get a better handle on prescription trends, team members reached out to ambulatory care pharmacists, who are part of a different team and who collaborate with physicians to treat members with cancer or chronic conditions. By partnering with the pharmacists, the team was able to plan ahead better.

“Once we know what patients are going to need, we make sure that we have that in stock,” says Wesley Frani, a pharmacy assistant and UFCW Local 135 member who is one of the team’s labor tri-leads. 

Key to the team’s success is another labor tri-lead, Jane Corby, an inventory control assistant and also a UFCW Local 135 member. She carefully monitors stock levels to ensure that when patients present their prescriptions, the right medications are on hand.

When teen members first visit the Burke Behavioral Health Center in Virginia, they are all asked the same intake questions, ranging from “What do you do for recreation?” to “Does your family have a history of violence?” Their answers help determine the best course of care.

Now, because of a unit-based team project to standardize care for transgender and gender-questioning members, teens ages 14 and older also are asked where they fall on the gender spectrum.

“We included this in the standard behavioral health assessment to normalize it instead of pathologize it,” says Sulaiha Mastan, Ph.D., a licensed clinical psychologist and UFCW Local 400 member. Mastan, who works exclusively with children and adolescents and has about 20 transgender teens in her care, says the information is important for treatment purposes.

For instance, a parent may say a child is depressed and is refusing to go to school. If that child is gender-questioning, gender-nonconforming or transgender, the underlying reason may have to do with changing clothes in the locker room or using the school restroom.

“If I have a teen who says, ‘I have a female body, but I am a male,’ then I am aware,” Mastan says.

High suicide rate

The stakes are high: A 2011 study found that 41 percent of transgender or gender-nonconforming people have attempted suicide sometime in their lives, nearly nine times the national average.

In another change, the unit’s front desk employees now check the electronic medical record to learn each member’s preferred name and pronoun, respecting that a member may, for example, appear male but identify as female.

“At the front desk, we are the first impression,” says Anthony Frizzell, a mental health assistant and member of OPEIU Local 2. “It is imperative that we relate to the patient in the way the patient wishes.”

The UBT also standardized the steps it takes when members are interested in hormone treatments; started a support group on transgender issues for parents; and is developing a brochure that will guide transgender adolescents through receiving care at Kaiser Permanente.

The policies it created follow national and KP guidelines, says Sand Chang, Ph.D., a psychologist and gender specialist in the Multi-Specialty Transitions department in Oakland.

“Although it is not routinely done, this is really falling in line with best practice—to give young people an option,” Chang says.

The project earned the team the R.J. Erickson Diversity and Inclusion Achievement Award at Kaiser Permanente’s 38th National Diversity and Inclusion Conference in October.

The team’s initiatives send the message that wherever a person is on the gender spectrum, it is part of being human, says Ted Eytan, MD, medical director of KP’s Center for Total Health in Washington, D.C.

“What the team is doing is making it very normal,” Dr. Eytan says. “It is something about you that we need to know, rather than something that needs to be extinguished.”

1933-1945: ‘There is no such thing as labor relations’

The health care program now known as Kaiser Permanente began in the Mojave Desert when Dr. Sidney Garfield, fresh out of medical school, opened a clinic for 5,000 Colorado River Aqueduct workers in 1933. Dr. Garfield soon found his practice foundering because insurance companies were sending the most serious—and most profitable—cases to Los Angeles hospitals. He developed a prepaid plan with a focus on safety and illness prevention, and it worked. The hallmarks of what would become the Kaiser Permanente Health Plan—prepayment, prevention and group practice—were forged here, but it would be 12 years before members of the public could join.

In 1938, Henry J. Kaiser and his son Edgar persuaded Dr. Garfield to create a similar medical program for workers building the Grand Coulee Dam in Washington.

The resulting industrial health plan was so popular, the unions insisted dam workers’ families be included. That feature carried over when Dr. Garfield built the largest civilian medical care program on the World War II home front, covering almost 200,000 Kaiser workers in California, Oregon and Washington.

With the traditional labor pool—young, healthy white males—serving in the military, thousands of African Americans and other people of color migrated to the shipyards, securing good union jobs after the long hurt of the Great Depression. Women came out in force, too. The Permanente Foundation Health Plan, both the on-the-job care and the broad coverage of the 50-cent-a-week supplemental plan, was extremely successful.

For the first time in their lives, ordinary people could count on affordable medical care.
 

1946-1989: ‘If not for organized labor’

On July 21, 1945, with the war in Europe over and the shipyards beginning to close, the Permanente Foundation Health Plan opened to the general public. A year later, on Aug. 1, 1946, Dr. Garfield signed the Permanente Foundation’s first union contract, with the CIO-affiliated Nurses’ Guild. The contract, in a first for Alameda County hospitals, established a 40-hour workweek, down from 48 hours.

Key support for the Permanente health plan came from unions. Harry Bridges, president of the International Longshoremen and Warehousemen’s Union, was an early advocate. He defended the plan against attacks by professional medical associations, whose members called prepaid group practice unethical, and brought all 6,000 ILWU members on the West Coast into the plan. Almost 15,000 members of the Retail Clerks Union in Los Angeles, a large and prominent union led by Joe DeSilva, joined in 1951.

But by the mid-1960s, financial pressures began creating divisions. In 1966, registered nurses in Northern California, represented by the California Nurses Association, became the first nurses in the state to conduct a work action. Major strikes erupted in 1968 in both Northern and Southern California. The strife simmered, and in 1986, a seven-week strike by SEIU Local 250 had some 9,000 clerks, certified nursing assistants and technicians walking the picket line at 14 Kaiser Permanente facilities in California. The action didn’t prevent a two-tier wage restructuring plan, but there was one positive outcome: The first Joint Conference on Service Issues, a precursor to the Labor Management Partnership agreement.
 

“Henry J. Kaiser’s Permanente Foundation Hospital in Oakland, built to provide pre-paid medical care for 100,000 shipyard workers, has been opened to the public,” the San Francisco Chronicle announced on July 21, 1945—a momentous shift for a health plan that had been serving only employees and their families.

With World War II coming to an end, the plan’s future had been in doubt. Sidney Garfield, MD, the sole proprietor of the Permanente Foundation Health Plan, argued for its continuance, as did ex-Kaiser workers and their unions in the San Francisco Bay Area. Henry J. Kaiser, always open to bold moves, said: “Well, why shouldn’t we open the plan to the public and see if it works?” While other industrialists had adopted programs to improve their workers’ health, Kaiser was the first to embrace the public.

The plan came under attack—doctors in private practice called it “socialistic.” But support from key labor leaders made the difference that ensured the plan’s success.

Kaiser’s long history of supporting labor—an ethical and business decision he’d come to when handling huge government contract projects—became even stronger in his remaining years. In 1965, the AFL-CIO presented Kaiser with its Murray-Green Award, the first businessman to be so honored by organized labor.

Relations between Kaiser Permanente and labor unions have experienced ups and downs since then. But as the early history of unions at KP and the advent of the Labor Management Partnership in 1997 make clear, there is no health plan in the country with a richer and more positive relationship with working people and the organizations that represent them.

Visit Kaiser Permanente's 70th anniversary mini-site.

A few months ago, a patient walked from the outpatient clinic to the operating suites at San Francisco Medical Center. He had an infection in his knee that needed to be drained. Paul Preston, MD, was at work and evaluated the man. His condition wasn’t urgent, and he got a bed to wait in.

What happened next is a cautionary tale. The patient’s condition changed—quickly and unexpectedly.

Dr. Preston, who was in charge that day, had moved on and was artfully multitasking on several other matters.

A nurse popped around the corner and interrupted him.

“Dr. Preston, this guy is sick,” she said.

Rapidly changing situations are a part of life in hospitals and clinics. But how they are handled varies wildly, depending largely on whether there is a culture of psychological safety—one where employees can speak up freely and offer suggestions, raise concerns and point out mistakes without fear of negative personal consequences.

Despite volumes of findings linking psychologically unsafe work cultures with poor patient outcomes—up to and including death—the health care industry, including Kaiser Permanente, continues to struggle with creating the culture of open communication that is a key component of safety.

Fortunately, this nurse worked with a physician and in an environment where speaking up is welcomed.

“Boy, was she right,” Dr. Preston recalls. “The patient had become septic in the short time he was there. I was obviously preoccupied, but what she had to say was far more important.”

The need for culture change

Positive exchanges like the one that day don’t yet happen reliably enough.

“I think there is a culture of fear around speaking up,” says Doug Bonacum, KP’s vice president of quality, safety and resource management. “We have indication (of that) from People Pulse scores.” In the patient safety world, Bonacum says, it’s still too common to hear of events with adverse outcomes where someone knew something wasn’t right—but didn’t speak up.

Studies have shown that poor communication among surgical team members contributes to a significant increase in patient complications or death (up to four times as many adverse events). Poor communication is also to blame in more than 60 percent of medication errors nationwide.  

“If I had a magic wand and could change one thing about the health care culture and the way we work together in order to improve patient care, it would be around our ability to speak up and people's willingness to listen and act,” Bonacum says. “I think it’s mission critical for worker and patient safety.”

Unit-based teams, by addressing issues of status and power, instinctive fear of retaliation and more, are helping build a culture where people are able to speak up. Leaders play a critical role in that transformation by actively developing rapport with employees and/or explicitly admitting mistakes and “disavowing perfection.”

“The definition of leadership is creating the condition to allow your team to succeed,” says Dr. Preston, who is the physician safety educator for The Permanente Medical Group. He notes that in aviation, senior pilots are strongly encouraged to tell those working with them, “If you see anything wrong, please let me know as soon as possible.”

Building new habits

A modified version of that practice, a pre-surgery briefing, now takes place in most Kaiser Permanente operating rooms.

“We don’t really want to say in front of the patient, ‘Hey, if I screw up, let me know,’” Dr. Preston says. “So we go around and say our names and what we’re going to do, and it builds confidence.”

The briefing, he explains, “is a conversation to build the group’s knowledge of what they're supposed to be doing, what to expect and watch out for. It sets the expectation that everyone needs to speak up.”

Dr. Preston says holding a briefing is the single most important thing a surgical team can do for patient safety. And debriefing afterward is critical, too, he says: “It's a chance for teams to consolidate what they learn. . . and get more and more reliable.”  

Leaders—physicians, managers, union co-leads and stewards—should model the behavior of speaking up around errors. Creating a blame-free environment, Dr. Preston says, “involves the willingness of leaders to go first in displaying vulnerability. . . by talking about mistakes they made when they wish someone had spoken up.”

Structured conversations help

Putting in place mechanisms that encourage employees to speak up is another way to foster open communication around errors and performance improvement. Such systems also provide a forum where people learn how to express themselves clearly and non-emotionally—and help to reconnect them with the value and purpose of their work.

South San Francisco Radiology’s unit-based team, for example, has created a structured communication system where radiologic technologists are asked to speak up in the moment and “stop the line” when they encounter anything that deviates from the agreed-upon workflow or is a potential patient safety risk. Afterward, they fill out a brief report that captures the event. 

“We made it an obligation for people to speak up,” says radiologic technologist Donna Haynes, the department’s UBT union co-lead and a member of SEIU UHW. “We wanted to empower employees.”

Since implementing the program in April 2012, more than 250 Stop the Line forms have been submitted. As a result, the department has prevented a number of small events from reaching the patient—and has seen a 50 percent reduction of “significant events” from the previous year, incidents in which a patient is incorrectly irradiated, whether it be a wrong body part or a scan is repeated unnecessarily.

The Stop the Line forms are simple and easily accessed in work areas and radiation rooms. They’re not used for punitive purposes; they’re used to track workflow issues that then are addressed by the UBT.

“For us it was a big rush, really trying to empower people to take the time to do what’s right,” says Ann Allen, the medical center’s Radiology director. “Also having trust in the fact that ‘I can submit real data and it will actually implement change.’ ”

Continuous learning

Allen’s comment speaks to another huge benefit to creating an environment where people feel free to voice their ideas and concerns: It makes the difference between an organization that is continuously learning and improving performance and one that is stifling innovation and stagnating.

The link between higher-performing unit-based teams and the ability to speak up is clear.

The People Pulse survey has a set of 12 questions that get at a department’s culture and comprise the Work Unit Index. One typical question is, “In my department or work unit, I am encouraged to speak up about errors and mistakes.” In 2011, the survey found that departments where Work Unit Index scores were highest had better HCAHPs scores, more satisfied patients, fewer workplace injuries, lower absenteeism, and fewer hospital-acquired infections and pressure ulcers. Departments whose Work Unit Index scores were in the bottom quartile consistently had poorer performance in those same areas.

“High-performing teams are clear on the goal…and hold each other mutually accountable for outcomes,” Bonacum says. “That level of accountability to each other is what differentiates them and enables people to say something that lower-performing teams can’t and won’t.”

Once you get to a tipping point, Dr. Preston says, people will look out of place if they aren’t speaking up.

“There's no such thing as a perfect day,” Dr. Preston says. Even good surgeons make errors—routinely—and no system, he says, can eliminate human error entirely. “But the earlier the team can recognize what is called an ‘undesired state’ and trap it, the less severe it is. And this is a huge thing for labor and managers, because we’re all there (in the room). Everybody has eyes and ears. The person who’s engaged has a huge role.”