Hank Libs: Show Me the Money
Have some fun—and reinforce the importance of reducing waste and saving KP money—by using this "Hank lib" at your team meeting. From the Winter 2013 issue of Hank.
Have some fun—and reinforce the importance of reducing waste and saving KP money—by using this "Hank lib" at your team meeting. From the Winter 2013 issue of Hank.
A look at UBT sponsorship, the challenges it faces, and the key role it plays in the success of teams.
Preliminary results from a comprehensive Office of Labor Management-sponsored study on the state of sponsorship across Kaiser Permanente.
Andrea Badellebess, OPEIU Local 29 labor liaison, and a labor sponsor of unit-based teams, talks about what it means to be a "family team" in the Fall 2012 Hank.
Linda J. Bodell, clinical director of Medical-Surgical Services at the Fontana Medical Center, discusses what works as a management sponsor of UBTs.
Have some fun—and reinforce the importance of sponsorship—by using this "Hank lib" at your team meeting.
This primer on interest-based problem solving demystifies the difference between a “position” and an “interest.”
Michael Hurley was the education director for the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions for several years, and he and his team designed many of the LMP programs used to support unit-based team education.
Interest-based problem solving (IBPS) is a collaborative approach to solving problems, a process for negotiating differences amicably without giving in. When you’re in an ongoing partnership—whether it’s a labor-management partnership or, say, a marriage—you likely have multiple objectives you want to satisfy when resolving differences. Those include not only the desire to solve the problem in a way that meets your needs, but also to solve it in a way that doesn’t cost too much (in time, money or emotional wear and tear), and that leaves the relationship intact or even improves it. Because down the road, you know you’re going to be working together again to solve the next problem that crops up.
Four words are at the heart of the interest-based process. The issue is the problem or subject area to be addressed. A position is a proposed solution. The interest is the underlying need, motivation or concern that may have to be addressed in order to reach a solution; you can tell an interest in part because there is usually more than one way to satisfy it. An option is a potential way to address the issue, in whole or in part.
Your position tells us what you want but not necessarily why you want it.
Your interests tell us what is important to you.
What do you do when you’ve got a position masquerading as an interest? Usually, you can get to the interests that underlie a position if you listen carefully and ask the right questions. Find out the needs and concerns behind the position. Here’s an example:
Statement by wife: “I hate living in Los Angeles. We should move to Oregon.”
Reaction to self: “Great, here we go again.”
Question to wife: “Why should we move to Oregon?”
Answer: “We’re in a rut. We’ve lived our whole lives here. I’m tired of it.”
Question: “What else appeals to you about Oregon?”
Answers: “The weather is too hot here, and we spend so much time stuck in traffic. We have to do all our exercising here at the gym. Oregon is cooler and there are prettier roads for biking. We can get to the woods and good hiking faster. People are more relaxed there. “
Interests: Change in weather, less traffic, easier access to uncrowded outdoors, less stress.
By starting with a discussion of interests, the parties can talk about what is important to them without staking out what they want the outcome to be. It opens the door to collaborative problem solving, as opposed to competition or compromise.
Find agreement on what data to collect and how to collect it, vet it and report it—or you’ll just argue about the data.
Create an action plan for turning solutions into reality. Be clear on who’s accountable for what. Establish a timeline.
Remember, interest-based processes don’t always work. In my experience, they have the best chance for success if the parties agree to:
A short column about the “multiphasic” exam, the 1951 precursor to the total health assessment.
In May 1951, Bay Area longshore workers participated in a groundbreaking medical program—the Multiphasic Screening Examination, the first comprehensive health assessment conducted in cooperation with a union.
The trustees of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union–Pacific Maritime Association (ILWU-PMA)Welfare Fund came up with the idea for the tests, thinking it would be a useful corollary to existing medical care by helping detect unsuspected chronic diseases so members could get early and effective treatment. The tests, given in the Local 10 offices, were designed to search out signs of lung cancer, tuberculosis, heart trouble, syphilis, diabetes, anemia, kidney trouble, and sight and hearing defects.
The trustees, together with the Local 10 welfare officer and the ILWU research department, worked out the program with the Permanente Health Plan. ILWU leader Harry Bridges promised results would be confidential and not affect job security, and complete follow-up care was assured as part of health plan coverage.
For a nurse on a hospital ward, it might seem quick and easy to grab the nearest sheet to mop up a spill or grab a huge stack of blankets to put in a patient’s room.
But for the Materials Management department at Panorama City Medical Center, that can be really wasteful.
And they should know. They’re the team responsible for purchasing and cleaning linens, and keeping patients comfortable.
With savings in mind, the materials UBT looked to educate other hospital staff about the true costs of buying and washing linens.
Managers and union members worked together to create a storyboard featuring photos of bed sheets used as a tablecloth at a barbeque, and price lists of supplies and laundering charges. And because the team piloted its effort in Maternal Child Health departments, it also included pictures of babies.
As the materials staff worked with the other teams, the storyboard was a big confidence booster to those who were not public speakers.
“At first I was really nervous,” says Sandra Hernandez, the team’s labor co-lead. “But then I saw people I knew in the room and that put me at ease.”
The team also reviewed linen usage and stocking levels with departments.
And their efforts paid off as they reduced the overall annual cost of linen in the Maternal Child Health department by 6.8 percent, more than three times the original goal.
They also were able to increase customer satisfaction scores in a year from 48 to 65 percent from internal clients such as inpatient units at the hospital,.
“It is important to be prepared with the data,” says management co-lead Steve Spickler. “But, you need to tell a story in addition to the charts. That’s how the UBTs make the connection between their contribution and the financial success of the organization.”
The materials management team at Panorama City Medical Center helped educate inpatient units about the high price of using linens inappropriately, saving thousands of dollars in wasted laundry and replacement costs.
This story ftells of two Colorado RNs who, on a flight home from the Mid-Atlantic States, end up aiding a sick passenger, an experience that strengthens their faith in the power of partnership.