LMP Concepts

Differences Between Grievances and Issue Resolution

Submitted by Laureen Lazarovici on Tue, 03/14/2017 - 15:59
Tool Type
Format
Topics
Hank
tips_grievance or issue resolution_Hank50

Need a quick refresher on the difference between grievances and the issue resolution process? Download this handy chart. 

Sherry Crosby
Tyra Ferlatte
Tool landing page copy (reporters)
Differences Between Grievances and Issue Resolution

Format:
PDF (color or black and white)

Size:
8.5" x 11"

Intended audience:
Any union and management leaders involved in solving workplace problems. 

Best used:
Use this chart to decide whether a grievance or issue resolution would be the best method for solving a sticky situation. 

Developing
Tracking (editors)
Obsolete (webmaster)
not migrated

Issue Resolution Step by Step

Submitted by Laureen Lazarovici on Tue, 03/14/2017 - 15:52
Tool Type
Format
Keywords
Topics
Hank
tips_Issue resolution infographic

Got issues? Use this handy flow chart to follow the road to issue resolution. 

Non-LMP
Tyra Ferlatte
Tool landing page copy (reporters)

Format:
PDF (color or black and white)

Size:
Two pages, 8.5" x 11"

Intended audience:
UBT co-leads, consultants and sponsors, as well as facility-level leaders. 

Best used:
This infographic is best used to understand the issue resolution process, step by step. 

Developing
Tracking (editors)
Classification (webmaster)
PDF (B&W version)
Obsolete (webmaster)
tips (checklist, etc.)
PDF
not migrated

Word Search: The Best of Partnership

Submitted by Beverly White on Tue, 03/14/2017 - 15:46
Tool Type
Format
Topics
Hank
Taxonomy upgrade extras
wordsearch_the_best_of_partnership

Use this word search to unlock key words and phrases that relate to key elements of working in partnership.

Tyra Ferlatte
Tyra Ferlatte
Photos & Artwork (editors)
Tool landing page copy (reporters)
Word Search: The Best of Partnership

Format:
PDF

Size: 
8.5" x 11"

Intended audience: 
Frontline workers, managers and physicians

Best used: 
Print out and share copies of this word search at the start of your next meeting. Team members will look for the words and phrases that express elements of working in partnership.

 

 

Attach/link tool (reporters or editors)
Released
Tracking (editors)
Classification (webmaster)
Transforming KP
Obsolete (webmaster)
other
PDF
hank
lmpartnership.org
not migrated

Meet Your National Agreement: Settle Disputes With Issue Resolution

Submitted by Paul Cohen on Fri, 03/10/2017 - 15:46
Hank
Request Number
Hank50 Know your NA-pc.doc
Long Teaser

Working in partnership doesn't mean people always agree on issues. But the Labor Managment Partnership has mechanisms to address issues and solve disputes--in ways that preserve working relationships. See how the 2015 National Agreement streamlines the dispute resolution process.

Communicator (reporters)
Non-LMP
Editor (if known, reporters)
Tyra Ferlatte
Notes (as needed)
pics to come from 2015 bargaining or other meeting/discussion shots
http://assets.lmpartnership.org/pages/view.php?ref=34049&search=2015+bargaining&order_by=relevance&sort=DESC&offset=96&archive=0&k=&curpos=102&restypes=1%2C2%2C3%2C4
http://assets.lmpartnership.org/pages/view.php?ref=34195&search=2015+bargaining&order_by=relevance&sort=DESC&offset=288&archive=0&k=&curpos=335&restypes=1%2C2%2C3%2C4
Photos & Artwork (reporters)
A new Issue Resolution process allows disputes to be resolved more quickly.
Only use image in listings (editors)
not listing only
Highlighted stories and tools (reporters)
TAKE ACTION: Learn more about problem solving in partnership

For questions about compliance with the 2015 National Agreement, speak with your union, manager or HR representative. 

Download the National Agreement to learn more about tools to solve problems in partnership.

  • For details on the issue resolution process, see Section 1.L. (pages 50–53) of the agreement.
  • See also Section 1.K.5., for disputes involving the creation of new jobs (pages 48–50).
  • See Section 2.C., for disputes involving wages and benefits (pages 70–72).

To initiate the Section 1.L.2 issue resolution process, use the form shown in Exhibit 1.L.2. (pages E30–E31) of the National Agreement or download it

Check out the Learning Portal to see the full range of LMP classes and workshops, including training in interest-based problem solving. 

 
Status
Done
Tracking (editors)
Filed
Story content (editors)
Headline (for informational purposes only)
Issue Resolution: A Better Way to Settle Lingering Disputes
Deck
Do people working in partnership always agree? People don’t.
Story body part 1

Kaiser Permanente and the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions resolve most differences involving our Labor Management Partnership through interest-based problem solving or interest-based bargaining. 

But when the process bogs down, the 2015 National Agreement provides a way for managers, physicians, union leaders and frontline workers represented by a coalition union to move it forward: issue resolution. 

Section 1 of the National Agreement covers a number of topics: how the partnership operates, unit-based teams, and such programs as Total Health and Workplace Safety. The most common disputes encountered are covered by this section. A new issue resolution process, one of three related provisions in the agreement, covers such disputes.

The process starts at the level at which an issue arises; so, for example: 

  • When disagreements arise at the facility level, the parties directly involved meet and use interest-based problem solving to try to resolve the issue themselves.
  • If they cannot do that within 30 days, the issue may be referred to the local LMP Council.
  • If there’s still no resolution, the next step is the Regional Council, and then national LMP leadership. Each body has 30 days to resolve the issue, using interest-based problem solving.
  • If no solution can be reached, the question may be decided by a joint panel that includes a neutral designee.

This process is an alternative to, but does not replace, existing grievance procedures. It offers another approach to problem solving. 

“It’s easy for people to get dug into their own place on an issue,” says Denise Duncan, president of UNAC/UHCP. “Partnership and the National Agreement commit us to spending the time to figure out jointly how to resolve problems and do the work.”

Obsolete (webmaster)
Migrated
not migrated

New Book Spotlights Partnership Success

Submitted by Paul Cohen on Mon, 03/06/2017 - 15:51
Role
Request Number
LERA book article_pc3.pw.cmo.doc
Long Teaser

A 2016 book published by Cornell University Press and the Labor and Employnent Relations Association includes three chapters on the Labor Management Partnership. Read excerpts and get a link.

Communicator (reporters)
Non-LMP
Editor (if known, reporters)
Non-LMP
Photos & Artwork (reporters)
Only use image in listings (editors)
not listing only
Highlighted stories and tools (reporters)
Leading Change Together

Read the chapter by Jim Pruitt, vice president of labor relations for the Permanente Federation, and Paul Cohen, LMP senior business consultant, that explains the conditions that gave rise to the partnership—and how partnership achieves results. 

Status
Done
Tracking (editors)
Story content (editors)
Deck
After 20 years, Labor Management Partnership still draws followers from health care and beyond
Story body part 1

When the leaders of Kaiser Permanente and the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions shook hands on their Labor Management Partnership 20 years ago, they weren’t sure where it would take them. Today, it is the largest, longest-running partnership of its kind. It is also the most studied by university researchers.

A new book published by the Labor and Employment Relations Association (LERA) and Cornell University Press shows that the partnership remains a model for workplace innovation. “The Evolving Healthcare Landscape: How Employees, Organizations, and Institutions are Adapting and Innovating” devotes three chapters to LMP’s history, accomplishments and challenges.

Lessons for others

Adrienne Eaton and Rebecca Givan, professors at Rutgers University, and Peter Lazes, a director and researcher at The City University of New York, studied six health care partnerships, including LMP. They were struck by:

“…the extent to which unions have been proactive in driving [all] these efforts....Another development in health care partnerships has been a significant deepening of the role of labor relations staff in operational matters.

“It is [also] important to note that the cases described here have influenced one another because the key stakeholders have directly learned from each other....[For example,] union and management stakeholders in Los Angeles [Department of Health Services and SEIU Local 721] as well as union leaders from the University of Vermont Medical Center have looked to Kaiser for answers.”

Another chapter, by Jody Gittell of Brandeis University and KP Northwest staff members Joan Resnick, Sarah Lax and Eliana Temkin, reports on regional efforts to promote collaboration across work teams. KP was selected for the study in part for what the authors call its “record of leadership and innovation [including] in patient care delivery, health information systems and labor-management relations.” Several strategies, including “living room huddles”—an informal, building-wide get-together—and job shadowing across departments led to higher employee engagement and patient satisfaction scores.

An inside look

The chapter “Leading Change Together” by Jim Pruitt, vice president of labor relations for the Permanente Federation, and Paul Cohen, LMP senior business consultant, explains the conditions that gave rise to the partnership, the need to implement it consistently across the organization and the way it achieves results:

“By bringing together diverse points of view and providing a framework for joint problem solving, the Labor Management Partnership has helped Kaiser Permanente tackle difficult issues....The partnership formed because conditions demanded change. It has endured because it has achieved measurable results. And it continues to flex and grow because we follow a few key principles and practices [including] self-directed work teams, interest-based problem solving and honest conversations.”

All of which explains why outside experts continue to take an interest in the joint efforts of KP and the union coalition. Pruitt and Cohen quote Thomas Kochan, a professor at MIT's Sloan School of Management, who put it this way in a 2013 study:

“Kaiser Permanente is now one of the nation’s leaders in the use of frontline teams to improve health care delivery....The Labor Management Partnership continues to serve…as a model for health care delivery and improvement.”

Obsolete (webmaster)
Migrated
not migrated

Leading Change Together

Submitted by Paul Cohen on Fri, 03/03/2017 - 17:02
Tool Type
Format
Role
LeadingChangeTogether_LERA.pdf

This book chapter from "The Evolving Health Care Landscape" provides an inside view of the history, accomplishments and challenges of the Labor Management Partnership.

Non-LMP
Tool landing page copy (reporters)

Format:
PDF

Size:
12 pages, 8.5" x 11"

Intended audience:
All workers, managers, physicians or others interested in the Labor Management Partnership

Best used:
This chapter from a Labor and Employment Relations Association (LERA) book on workforce innovation highlights the history and results of the Labor Management Partnership.

Done
Tracking (editors)
Obsolete (webmaster)
not migrated

Issue Resolution Form

Submitted by Paul Cohen on Wed, 03/01/2017 - 17:48
Format
Topics
ED-1430

Is something not working as it should in the Labor Management Partnership? Has an issue gone unresolved using the interest-based problem-solving process? Our partnership provides ways to solve problems that have gotten stuck. Use this simple form to start moving it toward resolution.

Non-LMP
Tool landing page copy (reporters)

Format:
PDF

Size:
One page, 8.5" x 11"

Intended audience:
Frontline workers and managers covered by the Labor Management Partnership seeking resolution of a difficult partnership issue

Best used:
Fill out this form and submit it to your local or regional LMP Council to expedite a solution to an issue that has gotten stuck.

Done
Tracking (editors)
Obsolete (webmaster)
not migrated

Make the Workplace Safer: Gardener and Groundskeeper Staff

Submitted by Paul Cohen on Fri, 02/10/2017 - 13:24
Tool Type
Format
wps_groundskeeper_checklist_0200917.pdf

A hands-on checklist of 31 potential hazards garderners and groundskeepers may encounter on the job—with advice on how to spot hazards, propose solutions and take steps to eliminate risks.

Non-LMP
Non-LMP
Tool landing page copy (reporters)

Format:
PDF

Size:
Seven pages, 8.5" x 11"

Intended audience:
Workplace safety co-leads, safety committee members, safety champions and frontline workers and supervisors

Best used:
This checklist of 31 potential hazards can help safety leaders and gardening/groundskeeping teams identify safety risks, propose solutions and resolve problems.

Done
Tracking (editors)
Obsolete (webmaster)
not migrated

Unit-Based Teams Are Getting Results: 2017

Submitted by Paul Cohen on Mon, 01/30/2017 - 14:52
Region
Tool Type
Format
Role
UBTs get results_2017.ppt

Unit-based teams are the platform for frontline performance improvement at Kaiser Permanente. See 12 examples of how they are reducing costs, improving service, enhancing quality and building a stronger workplace.

Non-LMP
Non-LMP
Tool landing page copy (reporters)

Format:
PowerPoint

Size:
12 pages, 8.5" x 11"

Intended audience:
Unit-based team members, co-leads, sponsors and consultants; union and KP leaders

Best used: 
Share in presentations or team meetings to see successful practices from UBTs across Kaiser Permanente.

Done
Tracking (editors)
Obsolete (webmaster)
not migrated