LMP Processes

Michael Hurley was the education director for the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions for several years, and he and his team designed many of the LMP programs used to support unit-based team education. 

1. Know why we use interest-based problem solving

Interest-based problem solving (IBPS) is a collaborative approach to solving problems, a process for negotiating differences amicably without giving in. When you’re in an ongoing partnership—whether it’s a labor-management partnership or, say, a marriage—you likely have multiple objectives you want to satisfy when resolving differences. Those include not only the desire to solve the problem in a way that meets your needs, but also to solve it in a way that doesn’t cost too much (in time, money or emotional wear and tear), and that leaves the relationship intact or even improves it. Because down the road, you know you’re going to be working together again to solve the next problem that crops up.

2. Understand key terms

Four words are at the heart of the interest-based process. The issue is the problem or subject area to be addressed. A position is a proposed solution. The interest is the underlying need, motivation or concern that may have to be addressed in order to reach a solution; you can tell an interest in part because there is usually more than one way to satisfy it. An option is a potential way to address the issue, in whole or in part.

Your position tells us what you want but not necessarily why you want it.

• A spouse wants to put 5 percent of income into a retirement savings account.
• A parent wants a child in bed by 9:30 on a weeknight.
• A union wants a 3 percent across-the-board wage increase in collective bargaining.

Your interests tell us what is important to you.

• A spouse wants enough saved to have a comfortable retirement.
• A parent wants a child to be well rested for school the next day.
• A union rep wants a compensation package for members that aids recruitment and retention.

3. Ask: Is that ‘interest’ really a position?

What do you do when you’ve got a position masquerading as an interest? Usually, you can get to the interests that underlie a position if you listen carefully and ask the right questions. Find out the needs and concerns behind the position. Here’s an example:

Statement by wife: “I hate living in Los Angeles. We should move to Oregon.”

Reaction to self: “Great, here we go again.”

Question to wife: “Why should we move to Oregon?”

Answer: “We’re in a rut. We’ve lived our whole lives here. I’m tired of it.”

Question: “What else appeals to you about Oregon?”

Answers: “The weather is too hot here, and we spend so much time stuck in traffic. We have to do all our exercising here at the gym. Oregon is cooler and there are prettier roads for biking. We can get to the woods and good hiking faster. People are more relaxed there. “

Interests: Change in weather, less traffic, easier access to uncrowded outdoors, less stress.

By starting with a discussion of interests, the parties can talk about what is important to them without staking out what they want the outcome to be. It opens the door to collaborative problem solving, as opposed to competition or compromise. 

4. Agree on the information

Find agreement on what data to collect and how to collect it, vet it and report it—or you’ll just argue about the data. 

5. Make an action plan

Create an action plan for turning solutions into reality. Be clear on who’s accountable for what. Establish a timeline. 

6. Set ground rules

Remember, interest-based processes don’t always work. In my experience, they have the best chance for success if the parties agree to:

• Focus on the issue, not personalities.
• Share information fully and early.
• Listen actively.
• Work hard to meet interests, not sell positions.
• Be open to options.
• Look for ways to build trust.

In 2011, the Medical Records unit-based team in the Northwest received 1,222,361 pages of outside records that required indexing into patients’ electronic medical records—a staggering 725,000 more pages than it received in 2010.

Yet team members met and mastered the challenges facing them, whittling down an enormous backlog and reducing the turnaround time for processing from 62 days in December 2010 to three days by December 2011—benefiting both their internal customers and KP’s members and patients. And they’re sustaining that success.

The steady increase had been debilitating. Overtime hours went through the roof, with more than 2,450 hours logged in 2010. The 37 team members work 24 hours a day, seven days a week and have seven different work classifications. Staff members were worn out. Piles of paperwork were stacked high, waiting for processing. Morale was at an all-time low.

The case illustrates vividly that service is not just a bedside issue at Kaiser Permanente. For a variety of reasons, many KP members see outside providers—and when those providers submit paper or electronic records with the patient’s medical information to Kaiser Permanente, the records have to get indexed into KP HealthConnect. If there’s a delay, the patient’s regular physician may be missing important information the next time the member is seen at KP.

“When the clinician needs medical information on their patients in order to treat their current medical condition, we’re able to provide updated and accurate records,” says the team’s union co-lead, Kathleen Boland, a data quality clerk and SEIU Local 49 member. And, she notes, members aren’t having to repeat critical tests and procedures, saving them time and money.

Things started to change when, through unit-based team training, team members learned such skills as process mapping and how to understand data. They created SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic/relevant, time-bound), started huddling and developed a greater understanding of roles and responsibilities.

The team receives more than 700 different types of documents, so variation was rampant. Team members developed cheat sheets to standardize how documents should be prepped for indexing and to get everyone to use the same process for each task. They also cross-trained and helped each other out when someone was on vacation or ill.

“In the beginning,” says Bruce Corkum, RN, a UBT resource team specialist, “they didn’t share the work. Then they started understanding how they could help each other work toward the same goal.”

Not only did the backlog disappear, but the need for overtime is nonexistent now, they’ve improved attendance and “morale has improved,” says Burgandy Muzzy, a health records clerk and member of SEIU Local 49. People are happy to be at work.

“People are talking about us in a positive way now,” says manager Debbie Lang, “instead of as ‘those people who lose everything.’ ”