Affordability

It started with a question from Oncology RN Tom Fought, a member of the Oregon Federation of Nurses and Health Professionals (OFNHP), at the Interstate Medical Office in the Northwest.

Why, he wondered, was primary tubing used for low-reaction drugs instead of the less-expensive short or secondary tubing?

That prompted the department’s unit-based team to start an improvement project that wound up saving $25,000 a year.

When patients come in for chemotherapy or other infusion medications, the drugs are administered via an IV: The bag holding the medication is hung on a pole, with a line that goes into the patient’s vein. When primary tubing is used, the valve to stop the flow of medication is very close to the patient’s body.

If the drugs being used have a high potential for an adverse reaction, it’s essential to use primary tubing, so that if there is an emergency and the line has to be shut, only a very little additional medication reaches the patient.

Appropriate times for less expensive options

When the short tubing or secondary tubing is used, the valve to stop the flow of medication is farther from the patient. In this situation, if the valve is closed, more medication is in the line and will flow into the patient until the tube is empty. These types of tubing are appropriate when the medication has a low potential for a negative reaction.

Primary tubing is $4.10 per unit, short tubing is $3.65 and secondary tubing is 65 cents. The costs add up if primary tubing is used when it’s not necessary.

“I had no idea that we would be saving the unit that much money by conforming the tubing,” Fought says.

This team alone was able to save $25,000 a year. If every Kaiser Permanente oncology infusion department adopted this practice, the savings would be dramatic.

“This was such an easy tweak—we just needed to think outside of the box,” says Lacey Anderson, RN, the Infusion Team Lead and a member of OFNHP, who was involved in the project. “The team realized this was such a great idea and wondered, ‘Why haven’t we been doing this all along?’”

Greater camaraderie

Heidi Rolf, the department manager and the UBT’s management co-lead, is proud of the work the team has accomplished. She attributes the success to the leadership of the team and notes that since the team has advanced to a Level 4 on the Path to Performance, team members have more camaraderie and are more engaged.

“At first it was a little difficult to change the habits of the nursing staff,” Fought says. “Within a few weeks, we had everyone on board and our tubing project took off.”

If people understand why we’re asking them to do certain things, they are more likely to help find solutions. That’s why unit-based teams, and their sponsors, must understand the implications of the Affordable Care Act to lead meaningful change.

The ACA is producing unprecedented changes in the marketplace. It is opening up health care to people who had little or no access to routine care before, and giving them choices they never had before. But for many, the choice will come down to dollars and cents—which means Kaiser Permanente needs to do two things, in partnership:

First, to attract new members, we have to offer competitive rates. Then, we have to wow them when they call or visit—especially the first time they call or visit

Know your role

As UBT sponsors, we have to ask ourselves: How are we going to do an awesome job of caring for patients and being the most affordable if our team doesn’t understand the impact it can have and isn’t involved in helping find solutions?

We need to understand what our role is in helping teams improve service and efficiency. If we, as sponsors, recognize that unit-based teams give Kaiser Permanente a competitive advantage and a way to drive change, and we provide the support for that work, we’ll largely have succeeded in our role.

Work with your team

When a manager or sponsor comes to me with an issue or area for improvement, one of the first things I ask is: Are you working with your UBT on this? If not, I ask them to try again—because becoming more efficient, cost-effective and member-centered doesn’t happen just in the administrative suite. It happens with the frontline staff and physicians. If sponsors, leaders and managers look to UBTs and their expertise, it will lead to solutions.

Sponsors and leaders also need to ask themselves: Have we figured out what resources the UBTs need to get the work done? Do they need the time, the meeting space, and a facilitator?

UBTs are only as good as the leaders who invest in them. We have more compelling reasons now than ever to leverage the partnership. If team members understand those reasons and are given direction and support by their sponsors, there is no limit to what we can do to help Kaiser Permanente continue to lead in this time of change.