High-performing teams

Course description

Team Leadership for Co-leads is designed to bring labor, management and physician co-leads together to facilitate conversations about the performance of their unit-based teams. The co-leads receive information about high-performing unit-based teams at Kaiser Permanente and then review a 360 feedback tool to use with their teams after the course. Participants will learn a basic coaching model and practice role playing UBT coaching scenarios. Participants also will learn the fundamentals of how people adapt to change, review a change management model for leaders, and make agreements on how to manage change in their role with their unit-based teams. In addition, participants will learn the fundamentals of Emotional Intelligence and how to use “EQ” when leading change.

Path to Performance

Level 3, 4, 5

Duration

8 hours

Who should attend

This course is intended for participants who are experienced co-leads of unit-based teams. Job categories who should attend union, management and physician co-leads.

Course requirements

• Labor Management Partnership Orientation (LMPO)
• Co-Lead Workshop
• Labor and management co-leads attend the training together

Last year, the outpatient procedure unit-based team at Capitol Hill Medical Center rewrote the instructions it sends to patients scheduled
for a colonoscopy. A patient who found the earlier directions confusing played a leading role in the process.

The new instructions helped reduce by 20 percent the number of colonoscopies that needed to be repeated. Involving the patient was “a transformational experience
for the team,” says Jennifer Walker, RN, lead UBT consultant and improvement advisor in the Mid-Atlantic States region.

It also showed the power of a new provision of the 2015 National Agreement. 

For years, success eluded the Baldwin Park Critical Care team. Mired in distrust, staff members didn’t participate in unit-based team meetings. As recently as 2011, few in the 49-member department knew the team existed.

“I didn’t even know what UBT stood for,” says Sheryl Magpali, RN, a member of UNAC/UHCP and now the team’s union co-lead. “No one claimed to be part of it. It was pretty much nonexistent until 2013.”

With a new manager on board, interest in the UBT grew. Staff members from the Critical Care Unit and its sister department, the Step-Down Unit, elected 12 representatives, who in turn chose Magpali as the labor co-lead. Celso Silla, RN, the new department administrator, became the management co-lead.

Old issues die hard

It was rough going at first.

Attendance was spotty. When the team did meet, members focused on long-simmering grievances about labor and personnel issues. The team reached out to Charisse Lewis, Baldwin Park’s UBT consultant. While consultants often focus on helping teams with using the Rapid Improvement Model and designing tests of change, they also help teams learn to work as teams—clearing up issues that are distracting them from the work at hand.

Lewis’s first steps were to encourage the team’s union members to meet separately with a labor representative.

“That helped relieve the stressors of the union issues,” Magpali says.  Now, she says, “team meetings focus on changes that affect the unit, rather than things we have no control over.”

The department—nearly all nurses, but also including ward clerks, who are SEIU-UHW members and one of whom is a team representative—began building trust in other ways, too. At Lewis’s suggestion, staff members organized a bowling night and had dinner together. This summer, they held a backpack drive.

Moving the team forward

“Charisse has been good at guiding us—attending our meetings, observing and listening and seeing how we can do better,” says Silla.

Lewis didn’t stop with team-building activities. She coached Magpali, a soft-spoken nurse, to speak up during meetings and make her voice heard, and she helped Silla overcome his reluctance to leave his union co-lead in charge of meetings.

Once trust was established, the team could turn its attention to improving patient care, with remarkable results. UBT members have reduced central line-associated bloodstream infections from five in 2014 to none as of August of this year. Buoyed by that success, they are working to reduce catheter-associated infections.

Silla attributes the improvements to the culture of partnership and putting frontline employees in charge of decisions that affect their work.

“We would have been in limbo” without Lewis’s guidance, Silla says. “Now we’re on the same page. We can be a Level 5 in the future.”

Kaiser Permanente and the Coalition of Kaiser Permanente Unions set an ambitious goal in the 2012 National Agreement: to have 75 percent of all unit-based teams achieve high performance by year-end 2014—for good reason. As teams develop, they deliver better, more affordable care and a better work experience.

There’s work to be done. More than 60 percent of teams in Georgia, Hawaii and the Northwest are meeting the goal, but overall, just 52 percent of KP’s 3,500 UBTs program-wide were rated high performing as of June 30.

The good news is that nearly 1,800 teams across KP have hit their mark, built performance improvement into their everyday work, and are showing other teams how to do the same.

Modeling the way

The Perioperative UBT at Ontario Medical Center in Southern California is one of those teams.

“It’s about having everyone involved and engaged,” says Michelle Tolentino, RN, one of the Perioperative UBT’s union co-leads and a member of UNAC/UHCP. “We attended UBT training together, got results on our first project (safely reducing patient stay times) and kept rolling.”

The 11-member representative team, which covers more than 60 nurses, surgical techs, medical assistants and others, reached Level 5 on the five-point Path to Performance soon after forming in 2012. Like many other teams in the region, it saw its rating drop in 2013 after a labor dispute led union members to suspend their UBT involvement. When the issue was resolved, the team regrouped and quickly regained its Level 5 rating.

The secret sauce

The team does a few key things right that helped it achieve and now maintain its high performance. Those can be modeled by other teams aspiring to Levels 4 and 5 status:

• Performance improvement tools: “Using our performance improvement tools—process mappings; run charts; plan, do, study, act cycles—keeps us all sharp,” says Mary Rodriguez, assistant clinical director and UBT co-lead. “That’s been key for us: understand the process and use the tools.”
• Constant tests of change: The Perioperative team now has seven active tests of change, most focusing on improving affordability and workflow efficiency. “Our projects often build off of other projects,” says Rodriquez. For instance, a recently completed project helped reduce turnaround time in the OR from 28 minutes to 20 minutes in three months. In a parallel project, the number of patients receiving medication at least 30 minutes before surgery—the ideal time for most patients—increased from 70 percent to 85 percent. Such projects draw on the whole team’s skills and perspectives, she says.
• Physician involvement: Shawn Winnick, MD, an anesthesiologist, assistant clinical director and UBT member, points to another key to success: “Physician presence on a (clinical) UBT is extremely important,” he says. “It brings a different perspective to projects.”

Calling UBTs “the single most powerful vehicle we have at KP to empower employees and lead change,” he notes that physician leaders at the medical center have supported UBT development and helped overcome barriers.

“Staff and physicians need to have the time to consistently make it to UBT meetings,” he says. “Even if it means bringing in someone to cover part of a shift, that is more than paid back by the cost savings and organizational benefits that come out of UBTs.”

The benefits accrue to the workforce as well as patients.

“We have a say in our work process,” says Robert Kapadia, a certified registered nurse anesthetist and member of KPNAA. “I come to the table as an equal partner and advocate for others on the team, and for our patients. Our UBT is a way to solve problems and move forward, not just complain.”

Dr. Winnick adds: “There’s not a single member of our team who hasn’t contributed an idea or helped make us better. That’s a measure of a performance. We all have different skills and perspectives, and we bring all of that to our team.”

Want to supercharge efforts to improve performance and help reach Kaiser Permanente’s strategic goals? Then bring unit-based team leaders together for a summit.

UBT consultants at several facilities in Southern California have organized summits that focused on Performance Sharing Program (PSP) goals, performance improvement strategies and affordability projects. All say they are seeing results in the forms of more robust UBT projects, clearer SMART goals, and stronger alignment between top medical center leadership and the work of UBTs.

After seeing teams improve service scores, reduce workplace injuries and save more than $160,000 in just four months in the San Diego service area, Sue Smith, a senior UBT consultant, concludes, “The overall experience was wonderful. Many teams had an exciting opportunity to network with other teams and learn new skills in a fun way.”

This spring, San Diego Medical Center hosted a UBT affordability summit, which brought together co-leads for a half-day to build the skills to tackle a new PSP goal for 2014 in the region: to increase the percentage of UBTs that successfully complete a project with hard dollar savings or improved revenue capture. (The projects are reviewed by finance departments to ensure they could lead to cost savings.)

Seated around large tables, UBT co-leads played a spirited game of “KP-opoly,” which offered a crash course in the organization’s finances. They heard from a UBT whose work resulted in cost savings. And they had time to work on driver diagrams and process maps for their own team’s affordability projects.

Co-leads gain PI skills

The year before, San Diego leaders—inspired by an event at the Riverside Medical Center—had held a more general, daylong UBT summit. That event brought UBT co-leads together for intensive training on performance improvement tools and created a space for them to refine their existing projects. Deadlines were set for finalizing driver diagrams and process maps, beginning tests of change and formulating sustainability plans.

The effort culminated in a UBT fair that showcased the projects that had begun as mere inklings at the summit: The ultrasound UBT demonstrated how it had gone injury-free for six months (it had been having at least one injury per month); the diagnostic imaging department boosted patient satisfaction scores from 87 percent in May 2013 to 93 percent in December.  

Leaders at the Woodland Hills Medical Center followed the same playbook, hosting an LMP summit in April that launched an array of of affordability projects to be showcased at a UBT fair scheduled for mid-July.

Mobilizing on PSP

At Fontana and Ontario medical centers, UBT staff used the summit model to mobilize the workforce around all of the region’s PSP goals. Top leaders from both management and the unions kicked off the day, then gave subject matter experts each 10 minutes to discuss the goal (whether it be service, workplace safety, attendance, etc.) and challenge co-leads to take on a performance improvement project to tackle it. A highlight was an impassioned and dramatic account from Roy Wiles, president of Steelworkers Local 7600, about a union member who did such a good job of saving up unused sick time that he recently retired with a five-figure nest egg in his Health Reimbursement Account.

The key to attracting co-leads to the summits, the consultants say, is to plan well in advance and to enlist top leadership to encourage participation. That lets managers and employees make plans for attending while ensuring their departments’ operational needs are met.

“This is part of their work,” says Priscilla Kania, senior UBT consultant at Ontario. “Your leaders are inviting you. People are excited to be in the room with top leaders.”

“What’s holding you back?”

Fresno Medical Center leaders asked their 50 unit-based teams that question directly late last year, at the same time they asked the teams to assess themselves on the new Path to Performance standards.

The answers mirrored what facilities everywhere say are challenges: training and sponsorship. Of the seven attributes of high-performing teams laid out in the Path to Performance, those two are consistently the most problematic.

Across the organization, many teams had their Path to Performance ranking lowered as a result of the 2010 year-end assessment—including Fresno, which UBT Tracker identified as having the highest percentage of high-performing teams in the organization. Fresno saw its number of Level 5 teams drop by more than half, from 27 to 14.

But Fresno had a plan for 2011.

“Early on, when we got a look at the Path to Performance, we created a strategy,” says Rick Senneway, Fresno’s director of performance improvement. “The Path to Performance helped focus us. (It) became very clear what we needed to work on.”

Even before they had the assessment results, Fresno leaders devised a 2011 UBT strategy for team development and performance improvement. It includes specific steps for moving teams at both ends of the spectrum along the Path to Performance.

“We’re engaged with our union partners at all levels,” says Jose DeAnda, medical group administrator. “At the UBT departmental level, (and) at the LMP Council level, by having each council member be a sponsor of UBTs and by having the sponsors report out at council meetings on how UBTs are performing.”

The goals were twofold: Move at least six teams up from Level 3 to Level 4 or 5 by the end of 2011, and help five teams achieve measurable improvement. Year-end assessments were not yet finalized when Hank went to press, but there’s optimism about the results.

“We did some good projects this year, and our affinity groups really helped,” says Navneet Maan, Fresno’s UBT consultant, referring to a system where teams working on similar projects met and shared ideas.

With a mandate to increase the number of high-performing teams by 20 percent in 2012, other teams and facilities might glean some ideas from Fresno’s three-pronged approach. 

Improve the support network for teams

One of the first things Fresno did was to revamp its sponsor network, including:

• Assigning sponsors to work in labor and management pairs and matching them so they share similar work areas;
• Reducing the number of teams sponsors work with to no more than four;
• Establishing new agreements that give sponsors more flexibility for how they meet with teams (in person or via email); and
• Setting quarterly deadlines for reporting on team status at LMP Council meetings.

The new agreements clearly defined expectations for sponsors, says Lynn Campama, Fresno’s assistant medical group administrator: “The role of the sponsor is about the performance of teams,” not about team management. “Everybody is accountable.”

Rather than trust that sponsors know how to be effective, Fresno used council meetings as a training opportunity. Sponsors received updated materials, ranging from a new form to help teams with meeting basics to information on the use of metrics and SMART (strategic, measurable, attainable, realistic/relevant, time-bound) goals. They also got forms to help collect team success stories and to help teams better manage UBT Tracker, the organization-wide system that helps teams report on and find effective practices.

In addition, “local resource network” members documented their particular expertise—be it UBT development, performance improvement, issue resolution and interest-based problem solving, attendance, service and workplace safety—and were assigned to teams needing that expertise.

“We took sponsorship to the next level,” says Lorie Kocsis, Fresno’s union partnership representative, LMP Council union co-lead and SEIU UHW member. “We tried to make their role easier for them to understand and to help them feel that they aren’t alone.”

Ron Barba, the director of the outpatient pharmacy and sponsor for the respiratory, inpatient and outpatient and surgery specialties teams, has noticed the difference.

“They gave us the training we needed to help the teams,” Barba says. “I feel more effective.”

Improve team training

To address training gaps identified by the teams, Fresno developed a brochure that puts all the offerings in one place—classroom, “just in time” and web-based training available through KP Learn—and groups the offerings by audience. That makes it easy to see what’s available for team members and what’s there for union and management co-leads.

At the same time, a request form for just-in-time training was developed, and both the brochure and the form were posted on Fresno’s intranet website. A clear process for requesting training was put in place, with team members instructed to submit their requests to Kocsis and Maan.

It didn’t stop there: Teams also got training in key partnership and performance improvement methods. A one-hour, just-in-time version of the eight-hour Consensus Decision Making (CDM) course was conducted with teams that requested or needed it. Teams working on non-payroll projects, such as reduction of inventory, were encouraged to take Northern California’s new business literacy training.

“Training had been one of our big downfalls keeping teams from higher performance,” says Debby Schneider, Fresno’s LMP consultant.

The brochure has heightened awareness of what’s available.

 “It helps us see at a glance what we need to take,” says Jeannine Allen, the administrative services supervisor and co-lead for the Adult Medicine UBT. “It’s been kind of a road map.”

Prioritize projects

To maximize the teams’ performance improvement impact, Fresno guided them toward projects that were achievable, would impact facility or regional goals, and were aligned with the Value Compass.

Teams used a  prioritization matrix to help them pick projects. That exercise sharpened teams’ focus and enabled members to “see how the work they are doing impacts the entire service area—not just their departments,” says Maan.

Teams shared ideas with their sponsors, who connected teams with other resources, including the experts in the newly established local resource networks and the affinity groups.

The experience of the Health Information Management team illustrates why such connections are invaluable. Its SMART goal was to improve customer service by way of a survey. Jeremy Hager, a care experience leader, was assigned to help the team.

He introduced the fishbone diagram to the team co-leads to help them identify which metrics the team should focus on to reduce customers’ complaints. He also helped them correctly interpret survey data. 

The affinity groups also helped teams. The six unit-based teams that made attendance a priority, for example, received tips, tools and specific training around the “six essentials of good attendance” identified by Ann Nicholson, LMP attendance leader for Northern California.

They also looked at their data going back several years, which “really made a difference,” says Eileen Rodriquez, assistant manager for OB/GYN. “It was an ‘aha’ moment.”

The team is meeting its attendance goals. With 6.17 sick days per full-time employee as of the first pay period in December, the team members exceeded the region-wide goal of 6.50. What made the difference? Managers are more flexible, and workers are more aware of the impact of missed days.

Staff members “feel comfortable coming to us,” says Norma Costa, department manager—and the team’s union co-lead, Lisa Madrigal, a medical assistant and SEIU UHW member, concurs.

“I know that if I need to take time off, I can go to my manager and talk with her about it and that she’ll do everything she can to accommodate me,” Madrigal says.

What's next?

Attendance will continue to be a focus of the facility’s UBT strategy for 2012—as will making it easier to use UBT Tracker. Refreshers on UBT basics will be provided, new tools introduced, and new affinity groups created.

And while local union steward elections will affect the sponsor pairings, sponsors will continue to get training and will continue to serve on the LMP Council in labor and management pairs.